Re: doxygen status

2005-03-24 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
On Thu, 24 Mar 2005, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: > On Thu, 24 Mar 2005, Hans Horn wrote: > > > Group, > > > > I noticed that the vintage of doxygen that ships with cygwin (v1.2.18) is > > more than two years old. > > This isn't surprising, as the last announcement for the doxygen package[*] > from Ry

Re: doxygen status

2005-03-24 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
On Thu, 24 Mar 2005, Hans Horn wrote: > Group, > > I noticed that the vintage of doxygen that ships with cygwin (v1.2.18) is > more than two years old. This isn't surprising, as the last announcement for the doxygen package[*] from Ryunosuke Satoh *was* more than two years ago... > The current v

Re: doxygen status

2005-03-24 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Mar 24 09:02, Hans Horn wrote: > Group, > > I noticed that the vintage of doxygen that ships with cygwin (v1.2.18) is > more than two years old. > The current version of doxygen (1.4.1-20050315) builds ootb and appears to > be functioning properly; I ran it on a mid-size C++ source tree and o

doxygen status

2005-03-24 Thread Hans Horn
Group, I noticed that the vintage of doxygen that ships with cygwin (v1.2.18) is more than two years old. The current version of doxygen (1.4.1-20050315) builds ootb and appears to be functioning properly; I ran it on a mid-size C++ source tree and on a rather large Java source tree. When doing