Re: dos format shell script executed fine with 1.5.12, fails with 1.5.23

2007-01-12 Thread Brian Dessent
jim wrote: > I have a dos format file containing a shell script that works fine on > 1.5.12. After upgrading to 1.5.23, the script fails. If I convert it to > Unix format, it works fine with 1.5.23, but I'm wondering what changed. > Cygwin mounts are the same; what else could be different? Th

Re: dos format shell script executed fine with 1.5.12, fails with 1.5.23

2007-01-12 Thread Matthew Woehlke
jim wrote: I have a dos format file containing a shell script that works fine on 1.5.12. After upgrading to 1.5.23, the script fails. If I convert it to Unix format, it works fine with 1.5.23, but I'm wondering what changed. Cygwin mounts are the same; what else could be different? Bash cou

Re: dos format shell script executed fine with 1.5.12, fails with 1.5.23

2007-01-12 Thread Larry Hall (Cygwin)
jim wrote: I have a dos format file containing a shell script that works fine on 1.5.12. After upgrading to 1.5.23, the script fails. If I convert it to Unix format, it works fine with 1.5.23, but I'm wondering what changed. Cygwin mounts are the same; what else could be different?

Re: dos format shell script executed fine with 1.5.12, fails with 1.5.23

2007-01-12 Thread Eric Blake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to jim on 1/12/2007 9:14 AM: > I have a dos format file containing a shell script that works fine on > 1.5.12. After upgrading to 1.5.23, the script fails. If I convert it to > Unix format, it works fine with 1.5.23, but I'm wondering wha

dos format shell script executed fine with 1.5.12, fails with 1.5.23

2007-01-12 Thread jim
I have a dos format file containing a shell script that works fine on 1.5.12. After upgrading to 1.5.23, the script fails. If I convert it to Unix format, it works fine with 1.5.23, but I'm wondering what changed. Cygwin mounts are the same; what else could be different? thanks for any insight