Earnie Boyd wrote:
It doesn't matter. If the working drive is E: and the symlink is on
C: then /usr/bin doesn't exist on E: and /usr/bin/ls or any other
binary will not work.
Ah... this sounds like a different problem than I understood it to be.
Let me relate an example and see if it sounds
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 9:54 AM, Linda Walsh wrote:
> Earnie Boyd wrote:
>>
>> Not in total. /usr/bin would only be available if the working device
>> is the same as the device containing the link.
>
>
> ???
> I think you are confusing junctions with symlinks.
>
> symlinks can point to anoth
Earnie Boyd wrote:
Not in total. /usr/bin would only be available if the working device
is the same as the device containing the link.
???
I think you are confusing junctions with symlinks.
symlinks can point to another device (including network
shares).
Note, you may have to enable set
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 7:59 AM, Linda Walsh wrote:
> Jiri Engelthaler wrote:
>>
>> 2012/9/23 marco atzeri :
>>
>>
>> And if I'm looking a way how to avoid this ...buggy feature..., my
>> answer is yes. If someone can help me with how to run gcc compiler
>> (see first post) which looks in ../libexe
Jiri Engelthaler wrote:
2012/9/23 marco atzeri :
And if I'm looking a way how to avoid this ...buggy feature..., my
answer is yes. If someone can help me with how to run gcc compiler
(see first post) which looks in ../libexec/.. for cc1.exe, I'll be
happy. My question is still same: How to
Dear Jiri --
If you want a version of gcc that runs natively under Windows,
why don't you install that? MinGW will provide that without
bringing all if cygwin into it. You will get C programs
compiled to run under Windows. If you compile under cygwin,
you will get programs designed to run unde
2012/9/23 marco atzeri :
> On 9/22/2012 11:03 PM, Jiri Engelthaler wrote:
>>
>> marco atzeri gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>>
>>> On 9/21/2012 10:48 AM, Jiri Engelthaler wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hello Cygwin developers
>>>> I have a
On 9/22/2012 11:03 PM, Jiri Engelthaler wrote:
marco atzeri gmail.com> writes:
On 9/21/2012 10:48 AM, Jiri Engelthaler wrote:
Hello Cygwin developers
I have a problem with cygwin default mounts
I have compiled gcc cross compiler for powerpc (some problem with arm
cross) and installed
marco atzeri gmail.com> writes:
>
> On 9/21/2012 10:48 AM, Jiri Engelthaler wrote:
> > Hello Cygwin developers
> > I have a problem with cygwin default mounts
> > I have compiled gcc cross compiler for powerpc (some problem with arm
> > cross) and installed to
On 9/21/2012 10:48 AM, Jiri Engelthaler wrote:
Hello Cygwin developers
I have a problem with cygwin default mounts
I have compiled gcc cross compiler for powerpc (some problem with arm
cross) and installed to destination directory. Installed directory
structure is (truncated)
+bin
| +powerpc
Hello Cygwin developers
I have a problem with cygwin default mounts
I have compiled gcc cross compiler for powerpc (some problem with arm
cross) and installed to destination directory. Installed directory
structure is (truncated)
+bin
| +powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu-gcc.exe
+include
+lib
+libexec
On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 09:15:31AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>> "You know better than to send this inquiry to the Cygwin list ..."
>
>>> "This is off-topic, it belongs on [EMAIL PROTECTED] ..."
>
>On or about 19th April all the XFree86 stuff became available at the Cygwin
>mirrors and for
>> "You know better than to send this inquiry to the Cygwin list ..."
>> "This is off-topic, it belongs on [EMAIL PROTECTED] ..."
On or about 19th April all the XFree86 stuff became available at the Cygwin
mirrors and for the first time required no special download or installation
procedures.
> -Original Message-
> From: Bernard Dautrevaux [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 6:01 PM
> To: Robert Collins; Bernard Dautrevaux; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Default mounts : one redundant?
>
>
>
>
> > -Origi
> -Original Message-
> From: Robert Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 9:50 AM
> To: Bernard Dautrevaux; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Default mounts : one redundant?
>
>
> This is off-topic, it belongs on [EMAIL PROTECTED] A
> -Original Message-
> From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 6:39 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Default mounts : one redundant?
>
>
> On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 04:39:12PM +0100,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wro
This is off-topic, it belongs on [EMAIL PROTECTED] And the answer
is in that lists archives.
Rob
> -Original Message-
> From: Bernard Dautrevaux [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 5:43 PM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: Defau
On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 04:39:12PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Nothing altered from the default full installation:
>
>~> mount -m
>mount -f -s -b "c:/Cygwin/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts"
>"/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts"
>mount -f -s -b "c:/Cygwin/bin" "/usr/bin"
>mount -f -s -b "c:/Cygwin/lib" "/usr/li
Nothing altered from the default full installation:
~> mount -m
mount -f -s -b "c:/Cygwin/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts"
"/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts"
mount -f -s -b "c:/Cygwin/bin" "/usr/bin"
mount -f -s -b "c:/Cygwin/lib" "/usr/lib"
mount -f -s -b "c:/Cygwin" "/"
mount -s -b --change-cygdrive-prefix "/c
Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc) [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] said:
>It is not setup.exe's expected behavior to put anything in /usr/bin and
>/usr/lib. It is setup.exe's expected behavior to mount dir>/bin to /usr/bin and /lib to /usr/lib. Unless you
>can provide more details of what you did, I have to c
At 03:11 PM 12/19/2001, Ching, Jimen wrote:
>David Starks-Browning [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] said:
> >There is an entry "Why the weird directory structure?" in the Cygwin
> >FAQ. Did you read it? If, after reading the FAQ entry, you still
> >have questions or problems, please report them to the list.
David Starks-Browning [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] said:
>There is an entry "Why the weird directory structure?" in the Cygwin
>FAQ. Did you read it? If, after reading the FAQ entry, you still
>have questions or problems, please report them to the list.
Apparently, this FAQ is accurate. The problem is
At 07:33 PM 12/18/2001, Ching, Jimen wrote:
> >No. You should check this out closely. If it's not an artifact your
> >custom environment (the fact that you mention symlinks to /bin and/or
> >/usr/bin makes me think your environment may be "fooling" setup.exe
> >into doing the wrong thing), plea
On Tuesday 18 Dec 01, Ching, Jimen writes:
> Hi all,
>
> I have just installed the latest cygwin dll. I noticed that the /bin and
> /usr/bin are now their own separate directories. At one point, they were
> symlinks. But when I reboot my computer, my mount table still shows the
> e:\cygwin\bin
>No. You should check this out closely. If it's not an artifact your
>custom environment (the fact that you mention symlinks to /bin and/or
>/usr/bin makes me think your environment may be "fooling" setup.exe
>into doing the wrong thing), please provide details of what you find.
>If you find it
At 03:15 PM 12/18/2001, Ching, Jimen wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>I have just installed the latest cygwin dll. I noticed that the /bin and
>/usr/bin are now their own separate directories. At one point, they were
>symlinks. But when I reboot my computer, my mount table still shows the
^
I don'
Hi all,
I have just installed the latest cygwin dll. I noticed that the /bin and
/usr/bin are now their own separate directories. At one point, they were
symlinks. But when I reboot my computer, my mount table still shows the
e:\cygwin\bin is mounted on /usr/bin, where e:\cygwin is mounted on
27 matches
Mail list logo
