On Feb 27 18:18, Eric Blake wrote:
> >
> > It looks like Corinna already nailed the issue, but for the
> > archive's sake, my complaint was that under //, d_ino and
> > st_ino did not match properly. With the 20060227 snapshot
> > (or whenever the next one is), the same test program
> > should no
> Corinna Vinschen replied:
> > I've applied a fix.
>
> I tried the fix in the 20060227 snapshot.
> It did not fix the 'pwd' problems I noted in:
> http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2006-02/msg00933.html
>
> (If it wasn't meant to, then please pardon my ignorance.)
There were two sets of bugs - one in
On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 01:47:35PM -0700, Jerry D. Hedden wrote:
>On Feb 27 17:22, Eric Blake wrote:
>> It looks like d_ino is not being correctly populated within //.
>
>Corinna Vinschen replied:
>> I've applied a fix.
>
>I tried the fix in the 20060227 snapshot.
>It did not fix the 'pwd' problems
On Feb 27 17:22, Eric Blake wrote:
> It looks like d_ino is not being correctly populated within //.
Corinna Vinschen replied:
> I've applied a fix.
I tried the fix in the 20060227 snapshot.
It did not fix the 'pwd' problems I noted in:
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2006-02/msg00933.html
(If it wa
>
> It looks like Corinna already nailed the issue, but for the
> archive's sake, my complaint was that under //, d_ino and
> st_ino did not match properly. With the 20060227 snapshot
> (or whenever the next one is), the same test program
> should now output:
Other directories that may have the
On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 05:58:50PM +, Eric Blake wrote:
>> >It looks like d_ino is not being correctly populated within //.
>> >Running the program below on snapshot 20060220 produced:
>>
>> A (somewhat) simple test case (patent pending) is nice but it really
>> should be accompanied with an e
> >It looks like d_ino is not being correctly populated within //.
> >Running the program below on snapshot 20060220 produced:
>
> A (somewhat) simple test case (patent pending) is nice but it really
> should be accompanied with an explanation of the problem. How about
> describing *in words* wha
On Feb 27 17:22, Eric Blake wrote:
> It looks like d_ino is not being correctly populated within //.
> Running the program below on snapshot 20060220 produced:
>
> $ ./foo
> Searching for //eblake, inode 10556217422951964268
> entry 553: name match only (inode 14394969718775064264)
> 2098 entries
On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 05:22:57PM +, Eric Blake wrote:
>It looks like d_ino is not being correctly populated within //.
>Running the program below on snapshot 20060220 produced:
A (somewhat) simple test case (patent pending) is nice but it really
should be accompanied with an explanation of t
It looks like d_ino is not being correctly populated within //.
Running the program below on snapshot 20060220 produced:
$ ./foo
Searching for //eblake, inode 10556217422951964268
entry 553: name match only (inode 14394969718775064264)
2098 entries processed
$ cat foo.c
#include
#include
#includ
10 matches
Mail list logo
