Corinna Vinschen writes:
> On November 18, 2014 12:54:22 PM CET, Olumide wrote:
> >Thanks Corinna.
> >
> >My application does not explicitly use XSI IPC functions. It's an
> >ordinary C++ application compiled with gcc.
>
> Your app calls shmat, either the exe or some DLL.
>
> >BTW, are ZN4muto7re
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On November 18, 2014 12:54:22 PM CET, Olumide wrote:
>Thanks Corinna.
>
>My application does not explicitly use XSI IPC functions. It's an
>ordinary C++ application compiled with gcc.
Your app calls shmat, either the exe or some DLL.
>BTW, are ZN4m
Thanks Corinna.
My application does not explicitly use XSI IPC functions. It's an
ordinary C++ application compiled with gcc.
BTW, are ZN4muto7releaseEP7_cygtls and ZN4muto7acquireEm also XSI function?
Regards,
- Olumide
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:
On Nov 18 01:05, Olumide wrote:
> On 18/11/2014 00:45, Olumide wrote:
> >According to the AMD CodeXL profiler, the modules cygwin1.dll and
> >cygstdc++-6.dll account for 65.67% and 5.13% respectively of the runtime
> >of my code. The breakdown is shown below:
>
> Reposting breakdown (hopefully wil
Just a guess : http://linux.die.net/man/2/shmat
Maybe your code needs to optimize around memory abit.
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 5:05 PM, Olumide <50...@web.de> wrote:
>
> On 18/11/2014 00:45, Olumide wrote:
>>
>> According to the AMD CodeXL profiler, the modules cygwin1.dll and
>> cygstdc++-6.dll a
On 18/11/2014 00:45, Olumide wrote:
According to the AMD CodeXL profiler, the modules cygwin1.dll and
cygstdc++-6.dll account for 65.67% and 5.13% respectively of the runtime
of my code. The breakdown is shown below:
Reposting breakdown (hopefully will be less mangled this time)
Function
According to the AMD CodeXL profiler, the modules cygwin1.dll and
cygstdc++-6.dll account for 65.67% and 5.13% respectively of the runtime
of my code. The breakdown is shown below:
Function ModuleTimer samples
Timer samples percent
shmat
7 matches
Mail list logo