Chris,
On Sat, Dec 22, 2001 at 10:22:37AM -0500, Chris McDonough wrote:
> FYI, Zope was broken under out-of-the-box Cygwin 1.3.6 because of the fork
> issue. The rebase solution allows Zope to work again.
>
> Many thanks,
You are very welcome! Thanks for taking the time to see if this solutio
y, December 21, 2001 7:51 AM
Subject: Re: cygwin fork() rebase solution (was Re:
dll_list::load_after_fork() blues ...)
> Chris,
>
> On Tue, Dec 18, 2001 at 10:28:13PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 08:33:50AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
> >
Chris,
On Tue, Dec 18, 2001 at 10:28:13PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 08:33:50AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
> >Your results are enough for me Jason - I'm happy to include this in
> >setup in some form.
>
> Nice job, Jason. Thanks for following this through.
You
Jason Tishler writes:
>
>I believe that I have found a rebase solution to the Cygwin fork()
>problem that has been causing Cygwin Python some grief lately. I added
>an offset option to the attached rebase tool. If I spread the DLLs out
>by an extra 0x1, then the fork() problem seems to be mi
On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 08:33:50AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
>Your results are enough for me Jason - I'm happy to include this in
>setup in some form.
Nice job, Jason. Thanks for following this through.
cgf
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:
Your results are enough for me Jason - I'm happy to include this in
setup in some form.
Rob
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygw
On Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 08:57:44AM -0500, Jason Tishler wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 11:52:08AM -0500, Norman Vine wrote:
> > Michael Hudson writes:
> > >FWIW, and I don't know how much that is, all tests pass if I link _socket
> > >statically. Oh, and this is building without threads, it see
7 matches
Mail list logo
