Re: cygwin and scsi tape drive.

On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 04:44:53PM +, Marc Schare wrote: >> Don't use mount. > >My only use of the mount command was to demonstrate that Windows and CYGWIN >knew about the tape drive. Mount with no parameters doesn't change the mount >table, does it? Do a: umount /dev/st0 and everything

Re: cygwin and scsi tape drive.

> > Don't use mount. > My only use of the mount command was to demonstrate that Windows and CYGWIN knew about the tape drive. Mount with no parameters doesn't change the mount table, does it? I'm not trying to reassociate the Posix device names, I'm merely attempting to use /dev/st0 as it

Re: cygwin and scsi tape drive.

On Fri, 28 May 2004, Marc Schare wrote: > Joshua Daniel Franklin gmail.com> writes: > > Have you read > > > > ? > > > > Particularly the part about "Note that you can't use the mount table > > to map from fixed device name to your own devic

Re: cygwin and scsi tape drive.

Joshua Daniel Franklin gmail.com> writes: > > Have you read > > ? > > Particularly the part about "Note that you can't use the mount table > to map from fixed device name to your own device name." > > I did read the note, but I don't

Re: cygwin and scsi tape drive.

Have you read ? Particularly the part about "Note that you can't use the mount table to map from fixed device name to your own device name." -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://c

cygwin and scsi tape drive.

Dear List: I've been trying to get my SCSI tape drive to work under Windows/XP Home Edition and CYGWIN and having absolutely no luck. My tape drive is recognized as an "other device" so Windows is clearly aware of it. I have CYGWIN Version 1.5.10.3 (which should be the latest) and MT package