On Fri, Jan 03, 2003 at 05:01:15PM -0800, Bill Wohler wrote:
> Peter Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Now I just have to work out the path problems, like why, after editing
> > an outgoing message, MH-E reports that it can't find
> >
> >/cygdrive/d/temp/d:/temp/draftsex/
> >
> > For some
Peter Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Aha! The Windows PATH. All I had to do was add "c:\cygwin\bin" to
> the front of the Windows path, and that fixed the problem.
Cool.
> Now I just have to work out the path problems, like why, after editing
> an outgoing message, MH-E reports that it c
Aha! The Windows PATH. All I had to do was add "c:\cygwin\bin" to
the front of the Windows path, and that fixed the problem.
Thanks to *ALL* who responded! I really appreciate it.
Now I just have to work out the path problems, like why, after editing
an outgoing message, MH-E reports that it c
On Fri, 3 Jan 2003, Peter Davis wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 03, 2003 at 03:34:20PM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> > On Fri, 3 Jan 2003, Peter Davis wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Jan 03, 2003 at 01:29:04PM -0500, Peter Davis wrote:
> > > > On Sat, Jan 04, 2003 at 02:14:04AM +0900, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
On Fri, Jan 03, 2003 at 03:34:20PM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Jan 2003, Peter Davis wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Jan 03, 2003 at 01:29:04PM -0500, Peter Davis wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jan 04, 2003 at 02:14:04AM +0900, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> > > > > "Peter" == Peter Davis <[EMAIL PRO
Igor Pechtchanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> P.S. This is likely a cygwin problem, so you might wish to remove the
> other two lists from this discussion and only post the final solution
> there.
Either way works for us (MH-E).
--
Bill Wohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.newt.com/wohler/
On Fri, 3 Jan 2003, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> [snip]
> P.S. This is likely a cygwin problem, so you might wish to remove the
Err, I meant "a cygwin-specific configuration problem"... Just to make it
clear.
Igor
> other two lists from this discussio
On Fri, 3 Jan 2003, Peter Davis wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 03, 2003 at 01:29:04PM -0500, Peter Davis wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 04, 2003 at 02:14:04AM +0900, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> > > > "Peter" == Peter Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > >
> > > >> The procedure entry point _ctype_ could n
On Fri, Jan 03, 2003 at 01:29:04PM -0500, Peter Davis wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 04, 2003 at 02:14:04AM +0900, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> > > "Peter" == Peter Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > >> The procedure entry point _ctype_ could not be located in the
> > >> dynamic link libr
Peter Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 04, 2003 at 02:14:04AM +0900, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
>> > > "Peter" == Peter Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> >
>> > >> The procedure entry point _ctype_ could not be located in the
>> > >> dynamic link library cygwin1.dll
Just some quick thoughts like xemacs using some tool like sendmail,
and normally it is included in the xemacs installation, but due to
different path, other installation, it picks the cygwin on one
computer, and some other on the other?
Regarding cygwin1.dll, you don't happen to have a bunch of su
On Sat, Jan 04, 2003 at 02:14:04AM +0900, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> > "Peter" == Peter Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> The procedure entry point _ctype_ could not be located in the
> >> dynamic link library cygwin1.dll
>
> Peter> So why is XEmacs even *looking* in cygw
I've been trying to get MH-E to run within XEmacs on both my home (Win
NT4) and office (Win 2000) machines. Both machines have XEmacs
(21.4.9 at home, 21.4.10 in office) and Cygwin (somewhere around
1.3.?) installed. Both XEmacs installations are of the Win32
version, as opposed to the Cygwin ve
I couldn't find any reference to this in the archives or else, apologies
if it has been previously discussed...
I've just upgraded cygwin1.dll, from 1.3.6-6 to 1.3.17-1
(just installed exim, which complained about the missing strlcpy
export in cygwin1.dll - 1.3.17-1 fixed this).
However, as a re
Pierre,
Corinna's earlier post indicated that using this pointer collided with
Cygwin's fork/exec mechanism...
Igor
On Tue, 10 Dec 2002, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 06:12:21AM +1100, Noel Gordon wrote:
>
> > If it is true that cygwin uses gethostbyname() from wsock
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 06:12:21AM +1100, Noel Gordon wrote:
> If it is true that cygwin uses gethostbyname() from wsock32.dll, and
> returns the wsock32.dll hostent* result to the application, then it
> is perhaps unwise to free() it. Following your tip, we find from ...
>
In net.cc cygwin take
> On Tue, 10 Dec 2002, Noel Gordon wrote:
>
> > Anyone else confirm that the following program compiled under
> > gcc 3.2, cygwin 1.3.17-1, on Win2k leaks memory?
> >
> > /*---*/
> >
> >
On Tue, 10 Dec 2002, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 10:36:04AM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> > On Tue, 10 Dec 2002, Noel Gordon wrote:
> >
> > > Anyone else confirm that the following program compiled under
> > > gcc 3.2, cygwi
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 10:36:04AM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Dec 2002, Noel Gordon wrote:
>
> > Anyone else confirm that the following program compiled under
> > gcc 3.2, cygwin 1.3.17-1, on Win2k leaks memory?
Confirmed. I found the missing fre
On Tue, 10 Dec 2002, Noel Gordon wrote:
> Anyone else confirm that the following program compiled under
> gcc 3.2, cygwin 1.3.17-1, on Win2k leaks memory?
>
> /*---*/
>
> #include
> #include
>
> int main()
&
Sorry, it decided not to reply to the list for some reason.
-Original Message-
From: Steve Fairbairn
Sent: 10 December 2002 08:57
To: 'Noel Gordon'
Subject: RE: cygwin 1.3.17-1 gethostbyname() leak
I can confirm it loses about 8k every sample of the Win2k Pro task manager
p
Anyone else confirm that the following program compiled under
gcc 3.2, cygwin 1.3.17-1, on Win2k leaks memory?
/*---*/
#include
#include
int main()
{
struct hostent *host;
while ( 1 )
{
if ( ( host = gethostbyname( "loca
;t know why. I didn't change anything.
I guess 5th time's the charm.
-Rolf
> -Original Message-
> From: Robert McNulty Junior [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 9:55 PM
> To: Cygwin
> Subject: cygwin 1.3.17-1
>
>
> This file
: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: cygwin-1.3.17-1
On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 06:37:32PM -0800, Rolf Campbell wrote:
>When I download that package from http://mirror.rcn.net, it says it is
>corrupt: "Installation error (?▌?▌ksum failure for
>file:///cygwin-1.3.17-1.tar.bz2), Continue
>with other packag
On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 06:37:32PM -0800, Rolf Campbell wrote:
>When I download that package from http://mirror.rcn.net, it says it is
>corrupt: "Installation error (?▌?▌ksum failure for
>file:///cygwin-1.3.17-1.tar.bz2), Continue
>with other packages?" And yes, the wor
This file is corrupted.
Setup fails to open it.
Size of file is 1066k, should be 1091k, according to Setup.
I tried five times to open it, no go, no show. Just fizzles out.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Docu
When I download that package from
http://mirror.rcn.net, it says it is corrupt:
"Installation error (ø▌®▌ksum failure for
file:///cygwin-1.3.17-1.tar.bz2), Continue with other
packages?"
And yes, the word checksum seems to be spelled with a
®
I tried downloading it 4 times, each wit
I've made a new version of the Cygwin DLL and associated utilities
available for download. As usual, a list of what has changed is below.
To update your installation, click on the "Install Cygwin now" link on
the http://cygwin.com/ web page. This downloads setup.exe to your
system. Then, run se
28 matches
Mail list logo
