I am amazed that, considering the warm fuzzy loving relationship
between Microsoft and Netscape/Mozilla, they continue to use VC. I
would expect them to lean over backwards to move over to gcc.
They are indeed, but converting the big build process from VC to gcc
is not so easy an operation ^_
Maybe they need Cygwin. ;-)
Larry
Original Message:
-
From: Lapo Luchini [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 08:59:19 +0200
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: cygwin, emacs, mozilla
>
>
>I am amazed that, considering the warm fuzzy loving relationship
>betwe
I am amazed that, considering the warm fuzzy loving relationship
between Microsoft and Netscape/Mozilla, they continue to use VC.
I would expect them to lean over backwards to move over to gcc.
They are indeed, but converting the big build process from VC to gcc is
not so easy an operation ^_^
Randall R Schulz wrote:
> At 12:15 2002-10-24, Thomas L Roche wrote:
> >Chris Lott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 10/24/2002 02:26 PM
> >
> >...
> >
> > > How well does Mozilla run on Cygwin
> >
> >That I don't know, but Moz says you can build Moz with Cygwin: see
> >
> >http://www.mozilla.org/build/win32.htm
Chris Lott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 10/24/2002 02:26 PM
> So, is there a significant advantage to running Emacs on Cygwin this
> way?
Yes, you get the availability of all (err, lots of :-) the tools that
emacs knows how to use and integrates well with, and a nicely-done
installer for same.
> I like th
Tomas,
At 12:15 2002-10-24, Thomas L Roche wrote:
Chris Lott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 10/24/2002 02:26 PM
...
> How well does Mozilla run on Cygwin
That I don't know, but Moz says you can build Moz with Cygwin: see
http://www.mozilla.org/build/win32.html
Intriguing, but I don't think this produc
6 matches
Mail list logo
