Re: cygport suggestion: src_postinstall

2012-03-10 Thread Yaakov (Cygwin/X)
On 2012-03-09 17:53, Ken Brown wrote: On 3/9/2012 5:58 PM, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: On 2012-03-09 15:26, Ken Brown wrote: and I don't like some of the things that are done in __src_postinst when I build that package. Could you specify? There are two things: 1. I don't think __prepemacs sho

Re: cygport suggestion: src_postinstall

2012-03-09 Thread Ken Brown
On 3/9/2012 5:58 PM, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: On 2012-03-09 15:26, Ken Brown wrote: My immediate reason for this request is that I'm thinking about ITP-ing emacs-auctex This too is in Ports: http://cygwin-ports.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=cygwin-ports/emacs-auctex Yes, I know. Tha

Re: cygport suggestion: src_postinstall

2012-03-09 Thread Yaakov (Cygwin/X)
On 2012-03-09 15:26, Ken Brown wrote: My immediate reason for this request is that I'm thinking about ITP-ing emacs-auctex This too is in Ports: http://cygwin-ports.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=cygwin-ports/emacs-auctex and I don't like some of the things that are done in __src_posti

cygport suggestion: src_postinstall

2012-03-09 Thread Ken Brown
I would like to suggest that cygport implement a user-redefinable src_postinstall function to replace __src_postinst. My immediate reason for this request is that I'm thinking about ITP-ing emacs-auctex, and I don't like some of the things that are done in __src_postinst when I build that pack