On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 5:02 AM, Csaba Raduly wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 1:55 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> On Jun 24 07:03, Earnie Boyd wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 5:11 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Using another build system doesn't mean you can't switch to the better
>>>
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 1:55 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Jun 24 07:03, Earnie Boyd wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 5:11 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> >
>> > Using another build system doesn't mean you can't switch to the better
>> > one.
>>
>> That depends on one's view of better and Chris
On Jun 24 07:03, Earnie Boyd wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 5:11 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >
> > Using another build system doesn't mean you can't switch to the better
> > one.
>
> That depends on one's view of better and Chris already believes he
> uses the better one. That is why is refus
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 5:11 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>
> Using another build system doesn't mean you can't switch to the better
> one.
That depends on one's view of better and Chris already believes he
uses the better one. That is why is refuses to use something else.
--
Earnie
-- https://s
On Jun 21 10:34, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 09:49:34AM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >On Jun 20 22:38, Andrew Schulman wrote:
> >> > If every maintainer would use cygport, it would allow us to change
> >> > the build method to one along the lines of most Linux distro
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 04:03:46PM -0400, Andrew Schulman wrote:
>>On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 09:49:34AM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>>On Jun 20 22:38, Andrew Schulman wrote:
>If every maintainer would use cygport, it would allow us to change the
>build method to one along the lines of mos
> On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 09:49:34AM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >On Jun 20 22:38, Andrew Schulman wrote:
> >> > If every maintainer would use cygport, it would allow us to change
> >> > the build method to one along the lines of most Linux distros.
> >> > In Linux distros, the maintaine
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 09:49:34AM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>On Jun 20 22:38, Andrew Schulman wrote:
>> > If every maintainer would use cygport, it would allow us to change
>> > the build method to one along the lines of most Linux distros.
>> > In Linux distros, the maintainer provides
On Jun 20 22:38, Andrew Schulman wrote:
> > If every maintainer would use cygport, it would allow us to change
> > the build method to one along the lines of most Linux distros.
> > In Linux distros, the maintainer provides only the spec file and
> > the source archive. The actual build fo
> If every maintainer would use cygport, it would allow us to change
> the build method to one along the lines of most Linux distros.
> In Linux distros, the maintainer provides only the spec file and
> the source archive. The actual build for all supported platforms
> could be done on
On Jun 20 11:43, Warren Young wrote:
> On 6/19/2013 12:38, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
> >On 2013-06-19 12:57, Warren Young wrote:
> >>You're not talking about anything different than the sort of thing
> >>Cygwin package maintainers go through, sometimes needing to arm-twist
> >>odd build systems to b
On 6/19/2013 12:38, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
On 2013-06-19 12:57, Warren Young wrote:
You're not talking about anything different than the sort of thing
Cygwin package maintainers go through, sometimes needing to arm-twist
odd build systems to behave according to cygport's expectations?
I thin
12 matches
Mail list logo
