On Mon, 30 Jan 2017 18:30:19, Jon Turney wrote:
> I added a workaround to the script so that corresponding decoding ('+'
> -> ' ') is skipped if it looks like a cygcheck request ('text=1'), so
> this should be working again
Confirmed fixed, thanks.
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/p
On 28/01/2017 03:01, Steven Penny wrote:
On Mon, 27 Jan 2014 16:43:23, Steven Penny wrote:
$ cygcheck -p 'g\x2b\x2b.exe'
I think this relies on this being interpreted as a PCRE regex, which
hasn't been the case for a while, since some server-side changes.
It looks like this is broken a
On 2017-01-28 12:06, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 01/28/2017 11:45 AM, Brian Inglis wrote:
>>> it did put me on the right track:
>>> $ cygcheck -p 'mingw32-g[:punct:][:punct:]' | awk 'NR>1{$0=$1}1'
>> Your command is the same as:
>> $ cygcheck -p mingw32-g[:ctnpu][:ctnpu] | sed '2,$s/\s.*//'
> Not ne
On 01/28/2017 11:45 AM, Brian Inglis wrote:
>> it did put me on the right track:
>> $ cygcheck -p 'mingw32-g[:punct:][:punct:]' | awk 'NR>1{$0=$1}1'
> Your command is the same as:
>
> $ cygcheck -p mingw32-g[:ctnpu][:ctnpu] | sed '2,$s/\s.*//'
Not necessarily. You forgot quotes, so dependin
On 2017-01-28 05:21, Steven Penny wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Jan 2017 21:01:14, Doug Henderson wrote:
>> Try this:
>> $ cygcheck -p "mingw32-g[*-,][*-,]"
>> Found 4 matches for mingw32-g[*-,][*-,]
> Thanks for this. Using ranges is gross, because it relies on your locale, but
> it did put me on the right
On Fri, 27 Jan 2017 21:01:14, Doug Henderson wrote:
> Try this:
> $ cygcheck -p "mingw32-g[*-,][*-,]"
> Found 4 matches for mingw32-g[*-,][*-,]
Thanks for this. Using ranges is gross, because it relies on your locale, but
it did put me on the right track:
$ cygcheck -p 'mingw32-g[:punct:][:pu
On 27 January 2017 at 20:01, Steven Penny wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Jan 2014 16:43:23, Steven Penny wrote:
>> $ cygcheck -p 'g\x2b\x2b.exe'
>
> It looks like this is broken again. package-grep does work:
>
> $ q=https://cygwin.com/cgi-bin2/package-grep.cgi
> $ curl -s "$q"'?text=1&arch=x86_64&grep=mi
On Mon, 27 Jan 2014 16:43:23, Steven Penny wrote:
> $ cygcheck -p 'g\x2b\x2b.exe'
It looks like this is broken again. package-grep does work:
$ q=https://cygwin.com/cgi-bin2/package-grep.cgi
$ curl -s "$q"'?text=1&arch=x86_64&grep=mingw32-g%2B%2B' | awk 'NR>1{$0=$1}1'
Found 4 matches for ming
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 9:47 AM, Gates, Roger wrote
> $ ascii +
It should be noted that "ascii" is not included with a base install, and part of
the "ascii" package
> $ cygcheck -p 'g\x{2b}\x{2b}.exe'
it should be further noted that the braces are not necessary in this instance
$ cygcheck -
On 1/27/2014 10:47 AM, Gates, Roger wrote:
$ ascii +
ASCII 2/11 is decimal 043, hex 2b, octal 053, bits 00101011: prints as `+'
Official name: Plus Sign
Other names: Add, Cross
$ cygcheck -p 'g\x{2b}\x{2b}.exe'
Found 11 matches for g\x{2b}\x{2b}.exe
But of course, everyone knows that! ;-)
Th
On Friday, January 24, 2014 9:26 PM Steven Penny wrote
>On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 10:05 AM, David Boyce wrote
>> How about 'g[+][+]' or 'g[+]{2}'?
>
>Please, no more lazy answers
>
>$ cygcheck -p 'g[+][+].exe'
>Found 0 matches for g[ ][ ].exe
$ ascii +
ASCII 2/11 is decimal 043, hex 2b, oct
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 10:05 AM, David Boyce wrote
> How about 'g[+][+]' or 'g[+]{2}'?
Please, no more lazy answers
$ cygcheck -p 'g[+][+].exe'
Found 0 matches for g[ ][ ].exe
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documen
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 7:07 AM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> So I'll change my answer to "I don't know".
How about 'g[+][+]' or 'g[+]{2}'?
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Un
On 1/22/2014 11:05 AM, David Boyce wrote:
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 7:07 AM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
So I'll change my answer to "I don't know".
How about 'g[+][+]' or 'g[+]{2}'?
May I suggest that curious folks can more directly validate workarounds
by trying them directly. cygwin.com gen
> On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 06:34:49AM -0500, Andrew Schulman wrote:
> >> >$ cygcheck -p 'g\+\+.exe'
> >> >Found 0 matches for g\ \ .exe
> >> >
> >> >How can I include a literal '+' (plus character) in my search?
> >>
> >> By remembering that this is a regex search. How do you quote special
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 06:34:49AM -0500, Andrew Schulman wrote:
>> >$ cygcheck -p 'g\+\+.exe'
>> >Found 0 matches for g\ \ .exe
>> >
>> >How can I include a literal '+' (plus character) in my search?
>>
>> By remembering that this is a regex search. How do you quote special
>> character
> >$ cygcheck -p 'g\+\+.exe'
> >Found 0 matches for g\ \ .exe
> >
> >How can I include a literal '+' (plus character) in my search?
>
> By remembering that this is a regex search. How do you quote special
> characters
> in regexes? Answer: With a '\'.
That's what he did. The single qu
On 22/01/2014 06:58, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 05:59:16PM -0600, Steven Penny wrote:
Searching for the popular compiler produces unexpected results
$ cygcheck -p 'g++.exe'
Found 0 matches for g .exe
$ cygcheck -p 'g\+\+.exe'
Found 0 matches for g\ \ .ex
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 05:59:16PM -0600, Steven Penny wrote:
>Searching for the popular compiler produces unexpected results
>
>$ cygcheck -p 'g++.exe'
>Found 0 matches for g .exe
>
>$ cygcheck -p 'g\+\+.exe'
>Found 0 matches for g\ \ .exe
>
>How can I include a literal '+' (plus
Searching for the popular compiler produces unexpected results
$ cygcheck -p 'g++.exe'
Found 0 matches for g .exe
$ cygcheck -p 'g\+\+.exe'
Found 0 matches for g\ \ .exe
How can I include a literal '+' (plus character) in my search?
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/p
20 matches
Mail list logo
