Re: compiling setup.exe (was Re: Distributing .ISO files.)

Ronald, What is the real nature of your objection to my including that content here? Surely it didn't captivate you into reading it all and hence wasting your time, did it? If you think it takes up too much space, then why didn't you edit it out of your gratuitous reply? Randall Schulz At 02:

Re: compiling setup.exe (was Re: Distributing .ISO files.)

Ehm.. do you really think we're interested in the output of upx --help here? I mean: "UPX - Ultimate Packer for eXecutables; see for details" would have been more than enough, don't you think? rlc On Mon, 3 Mar 2003, Randall R Schulz wrote: > Robert, > > Upx. >

Re: compiling setup.exe (was Re: Distributing .ISO files.)

On Tue, 2003-03-04 at 12:01, Robert Citek wrote: > At 07:27 PM 3/3/2003 -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: > >> I'm still getting my feet wet with the Cygwin sources, CVS, patch, etc. > >> For example, I downloaded the setup module and compiled it. Instead of a > >> ~100 K file, mine was ~10 MB. It

Re: compiling setup.exe (was Re: Distributing .ISO files.)

Robert, Upx. -==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==- % upx --help Ultimate Packer for eXecutables Copyright (C) 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002 UPX 1.24wMarkus F.X.J. Oberhumer & Laszlo Moln

compiling setup.exe (was Re: Distributing .ISO files.)

At 07:27 PM 3/3/2003 -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: >> I'm still getting my feet wet with the Cygwin sources, CVS, patch, etc. >> For example, I downloaded the setup module and compiled it. Instead of a >> ~100 K file, mine was ~10 MB. It seems to work, but obviously, I did >> something wrong.