On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 07:09:53PM -0800, David Gluss wrote:
>What's a command completion spec? Given a simple testcase, I could
>look into it.
Jason included everything you need to duplicate the problem in his
original message.
I haven't actually duplicated it myself since my version of cygwin
What's a command completion spec? Given a simple testcase,
I could look into it.
DG
- Original Message -
From: "Christopher Faylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 6:25 PM
Subject: Re: bash 2.05a command completion
On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 09:29:28AM -0500, Jason Tishler wrote:
>Command completion specs causes bash 2.05a specifically *and* Cygwin
>in general to behave "poorly." By "poorly," I mean that bash becomes
>unusable after attempting command completion and Cygwin cannot start
>new processes:
>
>$ ps
Michael,
On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 08:26:55AM -0800, Michael A Chase wrote:
> Could you have a development version of cygwin1.dll somewhere in $PATH?
Nope:
$ which -a cygwin1.dll
/usr/bin/cygwin1.dll
A Windows search comes up empty too.
Like I said in my previous post, the Cygwin proble
- Original Message -
From: "Jason Tishler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Cygwin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 06:29
Subject: bash 2.05a command completion spec bug
> Command completion specs causes bash 2.05a specifically *and* Cy
Command completion specs causes bash 2.05a specifically *and* Cygwin
in general to behave "poorly." By "poorly," I mean that bash becomes
unusable after attempting command completion and Cygwin cannot start
new processes:
$ ps
C:\cygwin\bin\bash.exe: *** mount table size version mismatch detecte
6 matches
Mail list logo