Re: bash: ls: command not found

Christopher Faylor cygwin.com> writes: > > On Sun, Oct 08, 2006 at 06:15:03PM +, tharpa wrote: > >Any suggestions? > > > >Sorry for my last post. When I had the problem without the period, I tried it > >with the period, which is what I posted by mistake, but same error either way. > > >

Re: bash: ls: command not found

On Sun, Oct 08, 2006 at 06:15:03PM +, tharpa wrote: >Any suggestions? > >Sorry for my last post. When I had the problem without the period, I tried it >with the period, which is what I posted by mistake, but same error either way. > >(I know that without the period is correct.) Problem rep

Re: bash: .ls: command not found

tharpa wrote: Any suggestions? Sure. Try "ls" rather than ".ls". If that doesn't help, please read and follow the problem reporting guidelines found here: Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html -- Larry Hall http://www.rfk.com RFK Partners,

bash: ls: command not found

Any suggestions? Sorry for my last post. When I had the problem without the period, I tried it with the period, which is what I posted by mistake, but same error either way. (I know that without the period is correct.) -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Probl

bash: .ls: command not found

Any suggestions? -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/