Achim Gratz writes:
> Ken Brown writes:
>> Achim, if I'm right, you don't have to do anything with xfig except to
>> add a dependency on urw-base35-fonts-legacy.
>
> OK, I'll check how I get this done.
Yaakov has added those requirements to the hint files, so they should
now be installed together
Ken Brown writes:
> Achim, if I'm right, you don't have to do anything with xfig except to
> add a dependency on urw-base35-fonts-legacy.
OK, I'll check how I get this done.
Regards,
Achim.
--
+<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+
Wavetables for the Waldorf Blofe
On 17/04/2018 6:45 AM, Ken Brown wrote:
On 3/22/2018 1:25 PM, Achim Gratz wrote:
Ken Brown writes:
What a mess!
Indeed.
There's a comment just yesterday at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1551219#c8
suggesting that there will be some Fedora changes in the urw font
package
On 3/22/2018 1:25 PM, Achim Gratz wrote:
Ken Brown writes:
What a mess!
Indeed.
There's a comment just yesterday at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1551219#c8
suggesting that there will be some Fedora changes in the urw font
package coming this week. So let's wait for the d
Ken Brown writes:
> What a mess!
Indeed.
> There's a comment just yesterday at
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1551219#c8
>
> suggesting that there will be some Fedora changes in the urw font
> package coming this week. So let's wait for the dust to settle, and
> then I hope we
On 3/20/2018 2:13 PM, Achim Gratz wrote:
Ken Brown writes:
The 35 core postscript fonts are now in
/usr/share/fonts/urw-base35. But I'm not sure what you have to do to
make xfig find them.
I just looked at Fedora's xfig packaging
(https://src.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/xfig.git), and the two
Ken Brown writes:
>> The 35 core postscript fonts are now in
>> /usr/share/fonts/urw-base35. But I'm not sure what you have to do to
>> make xfig find them.
>
> I just looked at Fedora's xfig packaging
> (https://src.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/xfig.git), and the two most
> recent commits fix issue
On 3/19/2018 10:44 PM, Ken Brown wrote:
On 3/19/2018 9:02 PM, Andrew P Paplinski via cygwin wrote:
Dear Cygwin X,
I am running X Server 1.19.6-2 built 2018-03-12
I have the following error:
$ xset fp+ /usr/share/ghostscript/fonts/
xset: bad font path element (#2), possible causes are:
D
On 3/19/2018 9:02 PM, Andrew P Paplinski via cygwin wrote:
Dear Cygwin X,
I am running X Server 1.19.6-2 built 2018-03-12
I have the following error:
$ xset fp+ /usr/share/ghostscript/fonts/
xset: bad font path element (#2), possible causes are:
Directory does not exist or has wrong perm
Dear Cygwin X,
I am running X Server 1.19.6-2 built 2018-03-12
I have the following error:
$ xset fp+ /usr/share/ghostscript/fonts/
xset: bad font path element (#2), possible causes are:
Directory does not exist or has wrong permissions
Directory missing fonts.dir
Incorrect font se
10 matches
Mail list logo
