Re: X: Authorization required, but no authorization protocol specified

2015-08-13 Thread Markus Hoenicka
At 2015-08-12 17:21, Jon TURNEY was heard to say: On 12/08/2015 07:22, Markus Hoenicka wrote: At 2015-08-07 11:26, Jon TURNEY was heard to say: You might try modifying startxwin to remove the -q from xauth -q to see if that reveals a bit more information. I finally got round to run this sugge

Re: X: Authorization required, but no authorization protocol specified

2015-08-12 Thread Jon TURNEY
On 12/08/2015 07:22, Markus Hoenicka wrote: At 2015-08-07 11:26, Jon TURNEY was heard to say: You might try modifying startxwin to remove the -q from xauth -q to see if that reveals a bit more information. I finally got round to run this suggested test too. The first time I try to start X I ge

Re: X: Authorization required, but no authorization protocol specified

2015-08-12 Thread Markus Hoenicka
At 2015-08-12 14:18, Ken Brown was heard to say: On 8/12/2015 2:22 AM, Markus Hoenicka wrote: At 2015-08-07 11:26, Jon TURNEY was heard to say: On 06/08/2015 17:56, Markus Hoenicka wrote: I've upgraded my setup yesterday and ran into a problem running the X server. X ran just fine before the

Re: X: Authorization required, but no authorization protocol specified

2015-08-12 Thread Ken Brown
On 8/12/2015 2:22 AM, Markus Hoenicka wrote: At 2015-08-07 11:26, Jon TURNEY was heard to say: On 06/08/2015 17:56, Markus Hoenicka wrote: I've upgraded my setup yesterday and ran into a problem running the X server. X ran just fine before the upgrade, just like any X client I threw at it. I'm

Re: X: Authorization required, but no authorization protocol specified

2015-08-11 Thread Markus Hoenicka
At 2015-08-07 11:26, Jon TURNEY was heard to say: On 06/08/2015 17:56, Markus Hoenicka wrote: I've upgraded my setup yesterday and ran into a problem running the X server. X ran just fine before the upgrade, just like any X client I threw at it. I'm aware that some defaults have changed in the c

Re: X: Authorization required, but no authorization protocol specified

2015-08-10 Thread Markus Hoenicka
At 2015-08-10 18:11, Achim Gratz was heard to say: Markus Hoenicka writes: HOMEDRIVE=C: HOMEPATH=\Users\ I don't know if these are relevant if you use roaming profiles though. The path I've shown as $HOME is not arcane at all. You still haven't shown what $HOME is set in Cygwin, only what pat

Re: X: Authorization required, but no authorization protocol specified

2015-08-10 Thread Achim Gratz
Markus Hoenicka writes: > HOMEDRIVE=C: > HOMEPATH=\Users\ > > I don't know if these are relevant if you use roaming profiles > though. The path I've shown as $HOME is not arcane at all. You still haven't shown what $HOME is set in Cygwin, only what path it maps to on Windows. > windows exlorer, t

Re: X: Authorization required, but no authorization protocol specified

2015-08-10 Thread Markus Hoenicka
At 2015-08-10 16:11, Markus Hoenicka erred: And why does it *not* change if I set HOME to a local drive? s/HOME/XAUTHORITY/ -- Markus Hoenicka http://www.mhoenicka.de AQ score 38 -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documenta

Re: X: Authorization required, but no authorization protocol specified

2015-08-10 Thread Markus Hoenicka
At 2015-08-10 15:44, Achim Gratz was heard to say: Markus Hoenicka mhoenicka.de> writes: I've noticed the discussion about those changes, but I don't fully understand the impact of them (and hopefully I don't have to). But I don't think my problem argues against Corinna's changes because HOME

Re: X: Authorization required, but no authorization protocol specified

2015-08-10 Thread Andrey Repin
Greetings, cyg Simple! >>> Is there anything unusual about your home directory? >>> >> >> Well, we use roaming profiles here at work. This has caused problems >> before, both in Cygwin and non-Cygwin apps. I've modified >> /usr/bin/startxwin like this: >> >> $ diff /usr/bin/startxwin.orig /usr/b

Re: X: Authorization required, but no authorization protocol specified

2015-08-10 Thread Achim Gratz
Markus Hoenicka mhoenicka.de> writes: > I've noticed the discussion about those changes, but I don't fully > understand the impact of them (and hopefully I don't have to). But I > don't think my problem argues against Corinna's changes because HOME > does not exist in my Windows environment. H

Re: X: Authorization required, but no authorization protocol specified

2015-08-10 Thread Markus Hoenicka
Am 2015-08-10 15:13, schrieb cyg Simple: On 8/10/2015 3:41 AM, Markus Hoenicka wrote: At 2015-08-07 11:26, Jon TURNEY was heard to say: Is there anything unusual about your home directory? Well, we use roaming profiles here at work. This has caused problems before, both in Cygwin and non-Cy

Re: X: Authorization required, but no authorization protocol specified

2015-08-10 Thread cyg Simple
On 8/10/2015 3:41 AM, Markus Hoenicka wrote: > At 2015-08-07 11:26, Jon TURNEY was heard to say: >> >> Is there anything unusual about your home directory? >> > > Well, we use roaming profiles here at work. This has caused problems > before, both in Cygwin and non-Cygwin apps. I've modified > /usr

Re: X: Authorization required, but no authorization protocol specified

2015-08-10 Thread Markus Hoenicka
At 2015-08-07 11:26, Jon TURNEY was heard to say: On 06/08/2015 17:56, Markus Hoenicka wrote: I've upgraded my setup yesterday and ran into a problem running the X server. X ran just fine before the upgrade, just like any X client I threw at it. I'm aware that some defaults have changed in the c

Re: X: Authorization required, but no authorization protocol specified

2015-08-07 Thread Jon TURNEY
On 06/08/2015 17:56, Markus Hoenicka wrote: I've upgraded my setup yesterday and ran into a problem running the X server. X ran just fine before the upgrade, just like any X client I threw at it. I'm aware that some defaults have changed in the couple of months since I upgraded, and I hope I've d

X: Authorization required, but no authorization protocol specified

2015-08-06 Thread Markus Hoenicka
Hi, I've upgraded my setup yesterday and ran into a problem running the X server. X ran just fine before the upgrade, just like any X client I threw at it. I'm aware that some defaults have changed in the couple of months since I upgraded, and I hope I've done everything the FAQ recommends to