Dave Korn sent the following at Friday, January 22, 2010 6:38 PM
>On 22/01/2010 21:28, Don Beusee wrote:
>>> People don't care about implementation details. They care about what
>> is running on the system (the WHOLE system).
>
> You are speaking for yourself. Not "everyone in the world".
(Larr
On 01/22/2010 06:15 PM, Don Beusee wrote:
I am a unix user that has moved to windows. I want unix commands on windows
that function like their unix counterparts. That is supposed to be one of
cygwin's missions, is it not? Isn't that one of the main reasons people get
cygwin? What's the point
On 1/22/2010 4:15 PM, Don Beusee wrote:
I am a unix user that has moved to windows. I want unix commands on windows
that function like their unix counterparts. That is supposed to be one of
cygwin's missions, is it not?
Sorry, but you're not exactly on the side of the angels when you argue
t
On 22/01/2010 21:28, Don Beusee wrote:
> People don't care about implementation details. They care about what is
> running on the system (the WHOLE system).
You are speaking for yourself. Not "everyone in the world". Try not to
forget that.
cheers,
DaveK
--
Problem reports:
at least allow us to
change the default behavior on our systems that does not involve changing
scripts or typing habits? Please?
-Don
-Original Message-
From: Marco Atzeri [mailto:marco_atz...@yahoo.it]
Sent: Friday, January 22, 2010 2:03 PM
To: cygwin@cygwin.com; d...@beusee.com
Subject: R
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 01:28:05PM -0800, Don Beusee wrote:
>People don't care about implementation details. They care about what
>is running on the system (the WHOLE system). They want kill and ps to
>show what's running on the system, not what cygwin "thinks" is running.
>Since exec() creates a
Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
> adding a system-wide flag to the CYGWIN environment variable is a
> 10 ton sledge hammer for the pin you're trying to drive home.
Yep. Especially as adding this:
alias ps='ps -W'
to ~/.bashrc will DTRT.
--
Chuck
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/probl
--- Ven 22/1/10, Don Beusee ha scritto:
> People don't care about
> implementation details. They care about what is
> running on the system (the WHOLE system). They want
> kill and ps to show what's running on the system, not what
> cygwin "thinks" is running.
then you are in the wrong place
On 01/22/2010 04:28 PM, Don Beusee wrote:
People don't care about implementation details. They care about what is
running on the system (the WHOLE system). They want kill and ps to show
what's running on the system, not what cygwin "thinks" is running. Since
exec() creates a new process on win
almost all users will prefer this behavior.
-Don
-Original Message-
From: Andy Koppe [mailto:andy.ko...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2010 9:02 PM
To: d...@beusee.com; cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: Why require ps -W and kill -f
2010/1/22 Don Beusee:
> ps -e on Unix displays
Don Beusee wrote:
ps -e on Unix displays “every process running on the system”. This command
doesn't do that under cygwin. Why should it be necessary to supply -W to
see all processes running on the system? This makes it incompatible with
Linux/Unix, and such scripts that rely on -e doing this
2010/1/22 Don Beusee:
> ps -e on Unix displays “every process running on the system”. This command
> doesn't do that under cygwin. Why should it be necessary to supply -W to
> see all processes running on the system?
Because those processes are not Cygwin/Unix processes. In particular,
they do n
On 1/21/2010 7:09 PM, Don Beusee wrote:
ps -e on Unix displays “every process running on the system”.
Not on every *ix. On FreeBSD, if you give -a (the BSD equivalent of -e)
as an unprivileged user, you can't see other people's processes, for
security reasons.
It would be nice if every *ix
> From: don
> To: cygwin
> Subject: Why require ps -W and kill -f
> Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 18:09:03 -0800
>
> ps -e on Unix displays “every process running on the system”. This command
> doesn't do that under cygwin. Why should it be necessary to supply -W to
> see
ps -e on Unix displays every process running on the system. This command
doesn't do that under cygwin. Why should it be necessary to supply -W to
see all processes running on the system? This makes it incompatible with
Linux/Unix, and such scripts that rely on -e doing this will not work the
s
15 matches
Mail list logo
