On 23/07/2010 10:02, Huang Bambo wrote:
>
> Gcc optimized out some code like
> *fp++ = *format_string ++;
>
> When I gdb to that line and "print fp", gdb reported that fp is optized out...
You need to check in more detail than that. GCC may have optimised away the
fp variable, but kept the f
On 23/07/2010 09:24, Huang Bambo wrote:
> The current gcc( 4.3.4 ) has some bug with O3 option. it will
> optimized out some needed code in some case.
> I meet this bug when I compile ACE library.
> If I use O2 option, everything goes fine.
> So, maybe many people may waiting for the new version. :
2010/7/23 Andy Koppe :
> On 23 July 2010 09:24, Huang Bambo wrote:
>> The current gcc( 4.3.4 ) has some bug with O3 option. it will
>> optimized out some needed code in some case.
>> I meet this bug when I compile ACE library.
>> If I use O2 option, everything goes fine.
>
> Have you got any actual
On 23 July 2010 09:24, Huang Bambo wrote:
> The current gcc( 4.3.4 ) has some bug with O3 option. it will
> optimized out some needed code in some case.
> I meet this bug when I compile ACE library.
> If I use O2 option, everything goes fine.
Have you got any actual evidence for this being a bug i
The current gcc( 4.3.4 ) has some bug with O3 option. it will
optimized out some needed code in some case.
I meet this bug when I compile ACE library.
If I use O2 option, everything goes fine.
So, maybe many people may waiting for the new version. :>
Thanks !
--
Problem reports: http://cygwi
5 matches
Mail list logo