Eric Blake wrote:
> According to Tim Prince on 12/23/2008 6:50 AM:
>> After installing automake, it is necessary to over-write autoconf with
>> autoconf 2.59 which is easily built from source, as gcc build requires
>> that specific version.
>
> The distro comes with a version of autoconf 2.59, and
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 8:50 AM, Tim Prince wrote:
> I'd be surprised if debian had a specific automatic dependency setup for
> gcc build, although more of the tools would be included in the base
> package selection, or come in automatically when installing gcc.
Nothing specific to gcc, but Debian
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Tim Prince on 12/23/2008 6:50 AM:
> After installing automake, it is necessary to over-write autoconf with
> autoconf 2.59 which is easily built from source, as gcc build requires
> that specific version.
The distro comes with a version o
Eric Blake wrote:
> According to Hongyi Zhao on 12/23/2008 3:05 AM:
>> I've try to use the setup.exe to do this thing. But I also meet the
>> following issues: which packages are the dependent pakages of gcc
>> 4.3.2? More specifically, in order to make gcc 4.3.2 work correctly,
>> I should selec
On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 06:05:43 -0700, Eric Blake wrote:
>In general, using setup.exe automatically selects all the dependencies
>without you having to worry about what they are; so it is sufficient for
>you to select gcc4 for installation, then install everything that was
>selected at the same time
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Hongyi Zhao on 12/23/2008 3:05 AM:
> I've try to use the setup.exe to do this thing. But I also meet the
> following issues: which packages are the dependent pakages of gcc
> 4.3.2? More specifically, in order to make gcc 4.3.2 work corr
On Mon, 22 Dec 2008 07:19:44 -0700, Eric Blake wrote:
>Yes, as evidenced by the fact that there is a gcc4 package containing a
>build of gcc 4.3.2. But since a pre-existing binary exists, that may be
>simpler for you than building your own.
I've try to use the setup.exe to do this thing. But I
On Mon, 22 Dec 2008 07:19:44 -0700, Eric Blake wrote:
>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>Hash: SHA1
>
>According to Hongyi Zhao on 12/22/2008 6:54 AM:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I've tried to compile GCC 4.3.2 / 4.4.0 under my CYGWIN_NT-5.1
>> 1.5.25(0.156/4/2) but failed. Can anyone have the successfu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Hongyi Zhao on 12/22/2008 6:54 AM:
> Hi all,
>
> I've tried to compile GCC 4.3.2 / 4.4.0 under my CYGWIN_NT-5.1
> 1.5.25(0.156/4/2) but failed. Can anyone have the successful
> experience on doing this?
Yes, as evidenced by the fact tha
Hi all,
I've tried to compile GCC 4.3.2 / 4.4.0 under my CYGWIN_NT-5.1
1.5.25(0.156/4/2) but failed. Can anyone have the successful
experience on doing this? Would anyone kindly give me some hints?
Thanks in advance.
--
.: Hongyi Zhao [ hongyi.zhao AT gmail.com ] Free as in Freedom :.
--
Uns
10 matches
Mail list logo