Re: Updated cygwin dlls don't have the .dll extension; instead have .dll.new

2006-12-25 Thread Larry Hall (Cygwin)
Linda Walsh wrote: Eric Blake wrote: According to Charli Li on 12/24/2006 1:39 PM: Fishy enough, the new dlls had a filename extension of .dll.new Which means Windows is scheduled to rename it automatically at the next reboot, since it was in use at the time you ran setup.exe. Didn't

Re: Updated cygwin dlls don't have the .dll extension; instead have .dll.new

2006-12-24 Thread Linda Walsh
Eric Blake wrote: According to Charli Li on 12/24/2006 1:39 PM: Fishy enough, the new dlls had a filename extension of .dll.new Which means Windows is scheduled to rename it automatically at the next reboot, since it was in use at the time you ran setup.exe. Didn't you read the messag

Re: Updated cygwin dlls don't have the .dll extension; instead have .dll.new

2006-12-24 Thread Eric Blake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Charli Li on 12/24/2006 1:39 PM: > Fishy enough, the new dlls had a filename extension of .dll.new Which means Windows is scheduled to rename it automatically at the next reboot, since it was in use at the time you ran setup.exe. Didn't

Updated cygwin dlls don't have the .dll extension; instead have .dll.new

2006-12-24 Thread Charli Li
When using setup.exe to update packages that includes dlls (such as cygwin), it installs the dlls, but have a different file extension. When I tried to start up bash after updating packages with new dlls, bash briefly spits out an error saying that it couldn't find cygreadine6.dll. zsh and company