> I was told over at the autoconf List that I should be using 2.54 because
> 2.53 'is an early alpha release'. I wonder if there are users on List
> here who might have been using a Autoconf-2.54 they've built themselves
> from GNU mainline source?
We're still using 2.53a (or b?), as something i
Nicholas Wourms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>> autoheader: autom4te failed with exit status: 1
>> at /usr/autotool/devel/bin/autoheader line 163
>>
>> Any ideas about what's wrong here?
>>
>
> I already reported this prior to Chuck's extended v
--- Soren A <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Using autom4te (GNU Autoconf) 2.53a
> autoheader (GNU Autoconf) 2.53a
> on CYGWIN_NT-4.0 1.3.10(0.51/3/2) 2002-02-25 11:14 i486 unknown
>
> $ /usr/autotool/devel/bin/autoheader
>
> /usr/autotool/devel/bin/autom4te: unrecognized op
Hello,
Using autom4te (GNU Autoconf) 2.53a
autoheader (GNU Autoconf) 2.53a
on CYGWIN_NT-4.0 1.3.10(0.51/3/2) 2002-02-25 11:14 i486 unknown
$ /usr/autotool/devel/bin/autoheader
/usr/autotool/devel/bin/autom4te: unrecognized option `--trace='
Try `/usr/autotool/devel/bin/autom4te --
4 matches
Mail list logo
