Hi,
> The Cygwin project has too many mailing lists.
+1
> I see real value in only 3 lists:
>
> 1. User discussions
> 2. Development of Cygwin-the-project (broader than the DLL)
> 3. Talk
-1
just unify only 1 ML is simple.
the cygwin ML flow looks not so massive.
Greetings, Warren Young!
>> 5. cygwin-patches
>> This one's going to be missing as soon as the Cygwin repo is migrated to Git,
>> IMO.
> Are you imagining Github style managed pull requests here? I expect
> Cygwin will be using their own hosting, which means you don't get that
> feature. That
I for one am finding this discussion rather boring and would prefer it be moved
elsewhere.
I can't see any changes happening - only one vote in favour apart from the OP,
and that's someone
who's views, as a result of his earlier behaviour, are likely to receive less
weight than he'd like.
I'm
On 6/21/2014 19:23, Andrey Repin wrote:
5. cygwin-patches
This one's going to be missing as soon as the Cygwin repo is migrated to Git,
IMO.
Are you imagining Github style managed pull requests here? I expect
Cygwin will be using their own hosting, which means you don't get that
feature. Th
On 6/21/2014 05:51, Adam Dinwoodie wrote:
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 03:07:37PM -0600, Warren Young wrote:
Every time someone says "That's not on topic here, go elsewhere," it
can easily be read as "Go away."
I've never seen a reply saying "that's not on topic here, go away"
I said "go elsewher
On 06/20/2014 03:07 PM, Warren Young wrote:
> The Cygwin project has too many mailing lists. This causes an
> unjustifiable amount of friction.
I tend to disagree; I'm happy with the current division of lists. None
of the lists are high-volume except for the main cygwin and X lists
On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 09:10:06PM -0400, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
>On 06/22/2014 05:38 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> But, then, I know of cygwin devs who feed orphans, rescues kittens, and
>> work to prevent global warming. So, as long as we're making
>> unsubtantiated allegations, it all wo
On 06/22/2014 05:38 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 02:21:49PM -0700, Linda Walsh wrote:
Adam Dinwoodie wrote:
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 03:07:37PM -0600, Warren Young wrote:
Every time someone says "That's not on topic here, go elsewhere," it
can easily be read as "Go awa
On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 02:21:49PM -0700, Linda Walsh wrote:
>Adam Dinwoodie wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 03:07:37PM -0600, Warren Young wrote:
>>
>>> Every time someone says "That's not on topic here, go elsewhere," it
>>> can easily be read as "Go away." The Cygwin project should only be
Adam Dinwoodie wrote:
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 03:07:37PM -0600, Warren Young wrote:
Every time someone says "That's not on topic here, go elsewhere," it
can easily be read as "Go away." The Cygwin project should only be
pushing away toxic people, and multiple mailing lists do not have
that h
Greetings, Warren Young!
> The Cygwin project has too many mailing lists. This causes an
> unjustifiable amount of friction.
Eh? Wait a second, please. Let me pull my fingers up and count.
So far, barring automatic mailing lists like -announce, we have:
1. cygwin (this exact one)
A
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 03:07:37PM -0600, Warren Young wrote:
> Every time someone says "That's not on topic here, go elsewhere," it
> can easily be read as "Go away." The Cygwin project should only be
> pushing away toxic people, and multiple mailing lists do not have
> that happy side effect.
I
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 4:07 PM, Warren Young wrote:
> I see real value in only 3 lists:
>
> 1. User discussions
> 2. Development of Cygwin-the-project (broader than the DLL)
> 3. Talk
Well said, I agree.
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http:
The Cygwin project has too many mailing lists. This causes an
unjustifiable amount of friction.
Every time someone says "That's not on topic here, go elsewhere," it can
easily be read as "Go away." The Cygwin project should only be pushing
away toxic people, and
14 matches
Mail list logo
