-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to smr on 4/16/2008 6:29 PM:
Please don't top-post: http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#TOFU
| Hi Christopher, is there currently an ETA for a release that would
| include this fix (whether that's 1.5.25-xx, or 1.6/1.7)?
In the classic open
Hi Christopher, is there currently an ETA for a release that would
include this fix (whether that's 1.5.25-xx, or 1.6/1.7)? I've been
out of the loop for a long time, so apologies if this is a question
you've been badgered with recently.
Thanks,
Steven
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 4:44 PM, Christoph
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 03:04:12PM -0700, smr wrote:
>Thanks very much Eric and Corinna for the responses -- glad to hear
>it's already fixed.
FYI, this will even be fixed in the 1.5.25 series eventually.
cgf
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports
Thanks very much Eric and Corinna for the responses -- glad to hear
it's already fixed.
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 6:13 AM, Corinna Vinschen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Apr 16 14:49, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > On Apr 16 06:23, Eric Blake wrote:
> > > According to smr on 4/14/2008 11:56 AM:
On Apr 16 14:49, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Apr 16 06:23, Eric Blake wrote:
> > According to smr on 4/14/2008 11:56 AM:
> > | Hi, I've just rebuilt my machine and done a clean install of the
> > | latest Cygwin, and am having a problem with tail. I'm wanting to know
> > | whether this is a
On Apr 16 06:23, Eric Blake wrote:
> According to smr on 4/14/2008 11:56 AM:
> | Hi, I've just rebuilt my machine and done a clean install of the
> | latest Cygwin, and am having a problem with tail. I'm wanting to know
> | whether this is a known issue before digging deeper.
>
> Not known to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to smr on 4/14/2008 11:56 AM:
| Hi, I've just rebuilt my machine and done a clean install of the
| latest Cygwin, and am having a problem with tail. I'm wanting to know
| whether this is a known issue before digging deeper.
Not known
FWIW, a little non-Cygwin (VS2008) test app to display results from
fstat(0,...) returns the same thing on XP and Vista Ent SP1:
0x2000 which means character special, and not regular.
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 3:23 PM, smr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've done some debugging of tail.exe on
I've done some debugging of tail.exe on XP (which works) and Vista
Enterprise SP1 (which doesn't), and so far have found two differences
when tailing output piped from another program:
1. S_ISREG (stats.st_mode) returns 0 on XP, but 1 on Vista (I
haven't yet determined if this is an Enterprise-on
Hi, I've just rebuilt my machine and done a clean install of the
latest Cygwin, and am having a problem with tail. I'm wanting to know
whether this is a known issue before digging deeper. For other
reasons, I've rebuilt my machine clean twice this weekend and have had
this problem both times -- I
10 matches
Mail list logo
