On Mon, Jun 26, 2006 at 11:47:08AM -0400, Igor Peshansky wrote:
>An alternative is to introduce explicitly versioned dependencies (i.e.,
>where the version becomes part of the package name). This is already done
>for shared library packages -- whenever a new version gets released, a
>compatibility
On Mon, 26 Jun 2006, Marshall Abrams wrote:
> I want to suggest splitting vim support files (installed in
> /usr/share/vim/vim) into a separate package from the
> binaries. There are two versions of vim binaries in Cygwin, the no-X
> version (vim), and the version with X GUI compiled in (gvim), b
I want to suggest splitting vim support files (installed in
/usr/share/vim/vim) into a separate package from the
binaries. There are two versions of vim binaries in Cygwin, the no-X
version (vim), and the version with X GUI compiled in (gvim), but their
(major) versions are not always in sync (as
3 matches
Mail list logo
