Re: Suggestion: improve cross-compiling ability

2013-07-09 Thread Yaakov (Cygwin/X)
On 2013-07-08 07:07, Fedin Pavel wrote: Hello! I have got one small idea on how to improve compatibility with cross-compiling Linux software. This time it's glibc. At certain point glibc's rpcgen program (which is being compiled for host), relies on '#ifndef __u_char_defined' and '#ifndef __

RE: Suggestion: improve cross-compiling ability

2013-07-09 Thread Fedin Pavel
Hello! > I don't know anything about _BSDTYPES_DEFINED but it sounds like some > autotools solution is already in place, which defines > __{u_char,daddr_t}_defined; it's hard to imagine a patch fixing that > autotools stuff to correctly differentiate cbuild from ctarget would be > poo-poo'ed by t

Re: Suggestion: improve cross-compiling ability

2013-07-08 Thread Greg Turner
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 5:07 AM, Fedin Pavel wrote: > Hello! I have got one small idea on how to improve compatibility with > cross-compiling Linux software. This time it's glibc. > > At certain point glibc's rpcgen program (which is being compiled for host), > relies on '#ifndef __u_char_defined

Suggestion: improve cross-compiling ability

2013-07-08 Thread Fedin Pavel
Hello! I have got one small idea on how to improve compatibility with cross-compiling Linux software. This time it's glibc. At certain point glibc's rpcgen program (which is being compiled for host), relies on '#ifndef __u_char_defined' and '#ifndef __daddr_t_defined' in order to determine prese