Thank you for quick response!
Waiting for a release.
On 3/19/08, Corinna Vinschen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mar 19 08:46, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Can anyone test this and see if it behaves differently?
>
>
> http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2008-03/msg00436.html
>
> I forgot to
On Mar 19 08:46, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Can anyone test this and see if it behaves differently?
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2008-03/msg00436.html
I forgot to CC you, sorry.
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader
Hello,
Can anyone test this and see if it behaves differently?
I use latest stable cygwin and Windows 2003.
Thanks,
Alon.
On 3/17/08, Alon Bar-Lev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Please CC my as I am not subscribed.
>
> Just notice a difference between Linux and cygwin, hope
> some
On Mar 17 22:48, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> When running under cygwin the exec program runs after about 60 seconds.
> The following is the output:
>
> __atfork_prepare
> __atfork_parent
> before sleep
> __atfork_child
> after sleep
>
>
> 56 [main] a 2952 sig_send: wait for sig_complete event fa
Hello,
Please CC my as I am not subscribed.
Just notice a difference between Linux and cygwin, hope
someone will be able to figure it out.
When running this program on Linux I get expected behavior.
When running under cygwin the exec program runs after about 60 seconds.
The following is the ou
5 matches
Mail list logo