On Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 09:12:11PM -0500, Paul McFerrin wrote:
>Brett Serkez wrote:
>>> From what I've been seeing, I'm starting to suspect that the problem(s)
>>is there in both cases, the scanner simply makes it much more
>>noticable. I do see more CPU consumption that I woud have expected
>>eve
Brett Serkez wrote:
[snip]
>
>> From what I've been seeing, I'm starting to suspect that the problem(s)
>
> is
> there in both cases, the scanner simply makes it much more noticable. I
> do see more CPU consumption that I woud have expected even without the
> virus scanner and the original post
2 matches
Mail list logo
