On 09/07/2013 02:35 AM, jacomoman wrote:
> Sam Nelson wrote
>> Sam Nelson
>>
>> siliconfuture.net> writes:
>>
>> These last three sections are repeated until the retries are exhausted (4
>> total). For the life of me, I can't see any error indicating exactly what
>> failed. Is there any way to
's trying to
download last.
Any ideas as to what might be going on or how to fix this would be greatly
appreciated.
Thanks.
-Jac
--
View this message in context:
http://cygwin.1069669.n5.nabble.com/Something-breaks-unattended-setup-think-it-s-just-version-no-filename-of-latest-gt5-relea
Sam Nelson siliconfuture.net> writes:
The same issue unfortunately returned later. I'm guessing that the "netcat"
package being obsolete may have not caused any issues and I was just jumping to
conclusions.
I tried using a new cygwin mirror (xmission) and now the install is working
cleanly agai
Christopher Faylor cygwin.com> writes:
>
> On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 11:50:33AM +, Fergus wrote:
> >Larry Hall (Cygwin) - Re: Cygwin 1.7.17 breaks unattended setup >> ..
> >one could then narrow in on the package that's causing
> > >> unattended mode to fail.
> >
> > > Assuming that's true,
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 11:50:33AM +, Fergus wrote:
>Larry Hall (Cygwin) - Re: Cygwin 1.7.17 breaks unattended setup >> ..
>one could then narrow in on the package that's causing
> >> unattended mode to fail.
>
> > Assuming that's true, why is there still a "Cygwin 1.7.17"
> > in the subject
Larry Hall (Cygwin) - Re: Cygwin 1.7.17 breaks unattended setup >> ..
one could then narrow in on the package that's causing
>> unattended mode to fail.
> Assuming that's true, why is there still a "Cygwin 1.7.17"
> in the subject?
Sorry, just inherited that subject line. Now changed. Quick r
6 matches
Mail list logo