Chuck,
So-called "top-posting" is not a sin or even a bad idea.
The source code for Cygwin Setup is available for download and installation
using Cygwin Setup.
Randall Schulz
Mountain View, CA USA
At 18:19 2002-10-29, CBFalconer wrote:
Glenn Murray wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Oct 2002, Jason Tishler
On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, CBFalconer wrote:
> Glenn Murray wrote:
> > On Thu, 24 Oct 2002, Jason Tishler wrote:
> > > On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 11:04:01AM -0600, Glenn Murray wrote:
> > >
> > > > I think that command line support in setup.exe is a great idea.
> > > > I noticed when browsing through the s
Glenn Murray wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Oct 2002, Jason Tishler wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 11:04:01AM -0600, Glenn Murray wrote:
> >
> > > I think that command line support in setup.exe is a great idea.
> > > I noticed when browsing through the source code that there were
> > > comments about it.
Jason,
I see now that a lot of people on the list agree that command line options
for setup.exe is a Good Idea and I'll let it go at that, in hopes that
some C++ wizard picks it up. In the meantime I'll muddle through with
scripts, lengthy explanations, and hand-holding.
Thanks for your response
Glenn,
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 11:04:01AM -0600, Glenn Murray wrote:
> Thanks again for the reply.
No problem. However, this thread is getting off-topic (and
cross-posted) so we should end it very soon or take it off-list, if
necessary.
> I think that command line support in setup.exe is a grea
Glenn,
This should be helpful:
http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2002-10/msg00109.html
Igor
On Wed, 23 Oct 2002, Glenn Murray wrote:
> Jason,
>
> Thanks again for the reply. I think that command line support in
> setup.exe is a great idea. I noticed when browsing through the source
Jason,
Thanks again for the reply. I think that command line support in
setup.exe is a great idea. I noticed when browsing through the source
code that there were comments about it. With command line support
many, if not all of the dialogs could be skipped, and it might make it
possible to inst
Glenn,
On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 04:46:51PM -0600, Glenn Murray wrote:
> Thank you very much for your reply, I am learning a lot already.
You are welcome.
> Keep in mind that my goal is to simplify installation of Cygwin
> PostreSQL, not to mention cygipc. The difficult part of the install
> is n
Jason,
Thank you very much for your reply, I am learning a lot already.
Keep in mind that my goal is to simplify installation of Cygwin
PostreSQL, not to mention cygipc. The difficult part of the install
is navigating through the setup.exe dialogs. Your Suggestion #2
reproduces that problem and
Glenn,
On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 11:14:36AM -0600, Glenn Murray wrote:
> It seems that the best solution would be to provide a self-contained
> Cygwin PostgreSQL installation that works independently of a
> previously existing installation.
The above is not possibly because it violates the one Cygw
We have a project (http://www.mines.edu/research/ccre) for which we
would very much like to use Cygwin PostgreSQL instead of Access. I'll
call this project "the Workbench". We are in the process of releasing
this code under the GPL and use PostgreSQL for our Linux version.
Our problem (my respo
11 matches
Mail list logo
