Re: New setup.exe snapshot - please test

2005-01-09 Thread bruno patin
I test this snapshot and the different problems linked to the thread under disappeared http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-xfree/2004-11/msg00192.html Thanks for your work B.Patin -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Do

Re: New setup.exe snapshot - please test

2004-12-30 Thread Reini Urban
Thomas Dickey schrieb: On Wed, 29 Dec 2004, Max Bowsher wrote: Version 2.457.2.1 - Fix setup keeping open handles to every tarball it installs during a run. (Which appears to have been indirectly responsible for the weird hangs people have been experiencing.) Is there a bugzilla or other track

Re: New setup.exe snapshot - please test

2004-12-29 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Wed, 29 Dec 2004, Max Bowsher wrote: Version 2.457.2.1 - Fix setup keeping open handles to every tarball it installs during a run. (Which appears to have been indirectly responsible for the weird hangs people have been experiencing.) Is there a bugzilla or other tracking tool for setup.exe ?

New setup.exe snapshot - please test

2004-12-29 Thread Max Bowsher
Version 2.457.2.1 - Fix setup keeping open handles to every tarball it installs during a run. (Which appears to have been indirectly responsible for the weird hangs people have been experiencing.) - Fix a miscellany of error-reporting deficiencies. - Close stdin, to protect against rogue postin

Re: New setup.exe snapshot available.

2003-03-11 Thread Robert Collins
On Wed, 2003-03-12 at 02:41, Hans Horn wrote: > A look at setup.ini that was newly created, revealed the following: > > setup-timestamp: 1047304219 > setup-version: 2.249.2.5 > > Looks like stale cheese, doesn't it? Not at all. You appear to be making an assumption that is incorrect. The setu

Re: New setup.exe snapshot available.

2003-03-11 Thread Max Bowsher
On Tue, 11 Mar 2003, Hans Horn wrote: > for some I had expected that this setup version (2.326) would be resizable - > or at least sporting a bigger dialog. > I guess I was wrong. Yes. A bigger dialog is coming soon. Resizablility is still in the future. > A look at setup.ini that was newly cr

Re: New setup.exe snapshot available.

2003-03-11 Thread Hans Horn
Dear all, for some I had expected that this setup version (2.326) would be resizable - or at least sporting a bigger dialog. I guess I was wrong. A look at setup.ini that was newly created, revealed the following: setup-timestamp: 1047304219 setup-version: 2.249.2.5 Looks like stale cheese, doe

Re: New setup.exe snapshot available.

2003-03-08 Thread Pierre A. Humblet
At 11:23 AM 3/9/2003 +1100, Robert Collins wrote: >There is a new setup.exe snapshot. It's a minor increment over the >current setup. >From an ntsec point of view it tries to insure that the file permissions *displayed* by ls -l allow at least rx access. When running the new snaps

New setup.exe snapshot available.

2003-03-08 Thread Robert Collins
There is a new setup.exe snapshot. It's a minor increment over the current setup. Specifically it should address the problems with ntsec being on by default, and a recent bug report where proxies that need a username and an empty password couldn't be used. You can download the snapshot

Re: new setup.exe snapshot

2002-01-30 Thread Robert Collins
=== - Original Message - From: "Michael Adler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 1:12 AM Subject: new setup.exe snapshot > > I just tried v2.185 of the new setup.exe, and I noticed a potential > glitch. > &

new setup.exe snapshot

2002-01-29 Thread Michael Adler
I just tried v2.185 of the new setup.exe, and I noticed a potential glitch. If you specify an alternative URL and you do not type it perfectly during your first attempt (like you forget the trailing slash), it's not easy to modify your entry--it seems like you can't add another entry with the sa

Re: New setup.exe snapshot

2002-01-28 Thread Michael A Chase
- Original Message - From: "Gary R. Van Sickle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 19:32 Subject: RE: New setup.exe snapshot > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTE

RE: New setup.exe snapshot

2002-01-28 Thread Gary R. Van Sickle
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf > Of Robert Collins [snip] > > - Original Message - > From: "John A. Turner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [snip] > > o if the window gets covered up, clicking on its button on the > > taskbar doesn't br

Re: New setup.exe snapshot

2002-01-28 Thread Robert Collins
=== - Original Message - From: "Charles Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > I believe this is now *really* fixed, and a new setup snapshot is at > > http://www.cygwin.com/setup-snapshots/ > > > FYI, this version still crashes if you click the "Add" User URL button, > but haven't typed anythi

Re: New setup.exe snapshot

2002-01-28 Thread Charles Wilson
Robert Collins wrote: > > I believe this is now *really* fixed, and a new setup snapshot is at > http://www.cygwin.com/setup-snapshots/ FYI, this version still crashes if you click the "Add" User URL button, but haven't typed anything into the entry box. --Chuck -- Unsubscribe info:

Re: New setup.exe snapshot

2002-01-28 Thread Robert Collins
=== - Original Message - From: "Robert Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > VC++ debugger reports exception code=0xc005, flags=0x, > > Address=0x0041e53e > > > > If you wish I can give you a memory dump! > > Don't worry - we've had on person reporting a memory crash on XP,

Re: setup.exe snapshot: install from local directory not working

2002-01-28 Thread Robert Collins
=== - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Robert Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 9:42 AM Subject: Re: setup.exe snapshot: install from local directory not working > On Wed, Jan 23, 2

Re: New setup.exe snapshot

2002-01-28 Thread Robert Collins
- Original Message - From: "John A. Turner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Robert Collins wrote: > > > Any and all testing/feedback is needed. > > I've been using it for a while, and have a bit of feedback... Thank you. > o if the window gets covered up, clicking on its button on the > taskba

Re: New setup.exe snapshot

2002-01-25 Thread John A. Turner
Robert Collins wrote: > Any and all testing/feedback is needed. I've been using it for a while, and have a bit of feedback... o if the window gets covered up, clicking on its button on the taskbar doesn't bring it back to the top like it does with other apps o it seems to crash on certain

RE: New setup.exe snapshot

2002-01-22 Thread Stephano Mariani
Robert Collins > Sent: 22 January 2002 09:54 > To: David Starks-Browning > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: New setup.exe snapshot > > The usual place: http://www.cygwin.com/setup-snapshots > > Rob > === > - Original Message - > From: "David St

Re: New setup.exe snapshot

2002-01-22 Thread Robert Collins
The usual place: http://www.cygwin.com/setup-snapshots Rob === - Original Message - From: "David Starks-Browning" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Robert Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 8:44 PM Subject:

New setup.exe snapshot

2002-01-22 Thread David Starks-Browning
On Tuesday 22 Jan 02, Robert Collins writes: > I've uploaded a new preview of setup.exe. Where do we get it? Thanks, David -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FA

New setup.exe snapshot

2002-01-22 Thread Robert Collins
I've uploaded a new preview of setup.exe. This is the first feature-complete setup.exe for the next setup release. Main changes from the current released setup.exe: * Support for multiple mirror sites (use Ctrl-Click). * A Wizard style interface. * Hierarchical categories can be clicked on - whi

Re: Setup.exe snapshot

2001-12-23 Thread Robert Collins
> On Sun, Dec 23, 2001 at 11:59:33PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote: > >* Dependencies will only trigger installation of a package - they won't > >force an upgrade of an installed package. (with the caveat that in the > >future versioned dependencies may force upgrades). > > Isn't this what has consi

Re: Setup.exe snapshot

2001-12-23 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Sun, Dec 23, 2001 at 11:59:33PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote: >* Dependencies will only trigger installation of a package - they won't >force an upgrade of an installed package. (with the caveat that in the >future versioned dependencies may force upgrades). Isn't this what has consistently got

Setup.exe snapshot

2001-12-23 Thread Robert Collins
I've placed a new snapshot of setup.exe at http://www.cygwin.com/setup-snapshots. Any commentary is welcome, with the caveat that duplicates aren't interesting - no not even to guage the popularity or impact of a problem. Triage occurs after inital analysis. Firstly, the known bugs: * The choose