Re: Setup Documentation

2004-11-30 Thread Brian Dessent
Arthur I Schwarz wrote: > A quick check of the index seems to not show what I'm looking for. I saw > (and must have downloaded) a document which describes what files setup > uses, how to construct the files and like matters. setup-net.html seems to > be a user's manual (by-the-by, it's located in

Re: Setup Documentation

2004-11-30 Thread Arthur I Schwarz
lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] .edu>

Re: Setup Documentation

2004-11-30 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
On Tue, 30 Nov 2004, Arthur I Schwarz wrote: > Sometime in the last several months there was a posting telling where the > Setup documentation can be found. I can't find the posting (sigh). Can > anyone tell me if there is and where there is some Setup documentation. > Somethi

Re: Setup Documentation

2004-11-30 Thread Joshua Daniel Franklin
On Tue, 30 Nov 2004 13:39:49 -0800, Arthur I Schwarz wrote: > Sometime in the last several months there was a posting telling where the > Setup documentation can be found. I can't find the posting (sigh). <http://sources.redhat.com/cygwin-apps/setup.html> > Can anyone tel

Setup Documentation

2004-11-30 Thread Arthur I Schwarz
Sometime in the last several months there was a posting telling where the Setup documentation can be found. I can't find the posting (sigh). Can anyone tell me if there is and where there is some Setup documentation. Something that says what, where, when, and how often? I am bedeviled

Re: Gold star for Joshua and a suggestion for setup documentation

2003-03-27 Thread Robert Collins
On Thu, 2003-03-27 at 16:09, Christopher Faylor wrote: > What do you think? Do we still need the words at > http://cygwin.com/download.html to exist as a separate entity? If so, > I'll probably add another documentation link to the main web page for > people who are first downloading cygwin. I

Re: Gold star for Joshua and a suggestion for setup documentation

2003-03-26 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Thu, Mar 27, 2003 at 05:36:38AM -, Elfyn McBratney wrote: >> (anyone sick of the "gold star" stuff yet?) > >No! ;-) > >> I just wanted to put in a kudo for Joshua Franklin and his work on the >> cygwin documentation. His latest setup documentation insta

Re: Gold star for Joshua and a suggestion for setup documentation

2003-03-26 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Wed, Mar 26, 2003 at 11:23:43PM -0600, Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote: >On Thu, Mar 27, 2003 at 12:09:25AM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> I just wanted to put in a kudo for Joshua Franklin and his work on the >> cygwin documentation. His latest setup documentation installme

Re: Gold star for Joshua and a suggestion for setup documentation

2003-03-26 Thread Elfyn McBratney
> Sounds fine to me. I do think we should at least leave a link to the > installer for veteran users. (Or do we all type in 'cygwin.com/setup.exe'?) I know I do :-) Regards, Elfyn McBratney [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.exposure.org.uk -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simp

Re: Gold star for Joshua and a suggestion for setup documentation

2003-03-26 Thread Elfyn McBratney
> (anyone sick of the "gold star" stuff yet?) No! ;-) > I just wanted to put in a kudo for Joshua Franklin and his work on the > cygwin documentation. His latest setup documentation installment is > really wonderful. It is just what we needed. Indeed. Nice Work! > I

Re: Gold star for Joshua and a suggestion for setup documentation

2003-03-26 Thread Joshua Daniel Franklin
On Thu, Mar 27, 2003 at 12:09:25AM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: > I just wanted to put in a kudo for Joshua Franklin and his work on the > cygwin documentation. His latest setup documentation installment is > really wonderful. It is just what we needed. Thanks! I don't rea

Gold star for Joshua and a suggestion for setup documentation

2003-03-26 Thread Christopher Faylor
(anyone sick of the "gold star" stuff yet?) I just wanted to put in a kudo for Joshua Franklin and his work on the cygwin documentation. His latest setup documentation installment is really wonderful. It is just what we needed. It is so good that I would like to suggest that maybe