Re: sendmail/setuid

2020-12-27 Thread Brian Inglis
On 2020-12-27 07:53, Tomas By wrote: On Thu, 24 Dec 2020 20:12:17 +0100, Brian Inglis wrote: On 2020-12-24 04:17, Tomas By wrote: I'm using the Cygwin Sendmail (8.14), and am getting this in the log file of a program that is supposed to send an email. | 451 4.0.0 drop_privileges: setu

Re: sendmail/setuid

2020-12-27 Thread Tomas By
Hi, Ok, thanks. I have now got to the point where it works if I start it from a "run as administrator" command shell. I start Sendmail by "sendmail start" in /etc/rc.d/init.d/". What is the easiest way to automate this without interaction? Ideally from a normal

Re: sendmail/setuid

2020-12-24 Thread Brian Inglis
On 2020-12-24 04:17, Tomas By wrote: I'm using the Cygwin Sendmail (8.14), and am getting this in the log file of a program that is supposed to send an email. | 451 4.0.0 drop_privileges: setuid(18) failed: Operation not permitted | RSET | 250 2.0.0 Reset state Does this come from Cygwi

sendmail/setuid

2020-12-24 Thread Tomas By
Hi all, I'm using the Cygwin Sendmail (8.14), and am getting this in the log file of a program that is supposed to send an email. | 451 4.0.0 drop_privileges: setuid(18) failed: Operation not permitted | RSET | 250 2.0.0 Reset state Does this come from Cygwin? It would be odd if it is fro

[ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: sendmail 8.14.9-2

2015-12-29 Thread D. Boland
Version 8.14.9-2 of "sendmail" has been uploaded. General purpose internetwork email routing facility that supports many kinds of mail-transfer and delivery methods, including SMTP, SMTPS (STARTTLS), SMTPA (AUTH) used for email transport over the internet. -- v. 8.14.9-2 * sendm

[ANNOUNCEMENT] New package: sendmail 8.14.9-1

2015-06-11 Thread Daniel
Version 8.14.9-1 of the Sendmail mail server has been uploaded. Unix Mail Transfer Agent (mail server) General purpose internetwork email routing facility that supports many kinds of mail-transfer and delivery methods, including SMTP, SMTPS (STARTTLS), SMTPA (AUTH) used for email transport

Re: Impending ITP of Sendmail

2014-08-12 Thread Corinna Vinschen
rocmail would have to be modified slightly. > > > > From the Cygwin website, I can see that procmail is maintained bij > > > > Jason Tishler. > > > > > > > > I need these modifications for Sendmail to work. I remember Corinna > > > > mention

Re: Impending ITP of Sendmail

2014-08-11 Thread D. Boland
ebsite, I can see that procmail is maintained bij > > > Jason Tishler. > > > > > > I need these modifications for Sendmail to work. I remember Corinna > > > mentioning that the package is old and needs to be updated. Maybe it > > > is orphaned? In tha

Re: Impending ITP of Sendmail

2014-08-11 Thread Jason Tishler
on Tishler. > > > > I need these modifications for Sendmail to work. I remember Corinna > > mentioning that the package is old and needs to be updated. Maybe it > > is orphaned? In that case I'd be happy to adopt it. > > Jason, ping? > > I already buil

Re: Impending ITP of Sendmail

2014-08-11 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Aug 9 22:41, D. Boland wrote: > Hi group, > > I have the Sendmail port ready. I will anounce my intent to package it > soon. > > There is one thing, though. Sendmail relies heavily on the procmail > program. The problem is that the procmail package as it is now, is

Impending ITP of Sendmail

2014-08-09 Thread D. Boland
Hi group, I have the Sendmail port ready. I will anounce my intent to package it soon. There is one thing, though. Sendmail relies heavily on the procmail program. The problem is that the procmail package as it is now, is not "multiple root" aware. It also is not able to do suid at

Re: exim-config, email, probably more: what is the expected path to sendmail?

2011-10-16 Thread René Berber
On 10/16/2011 5:29 PM, Regid Ichira wrote: > email 3.1.2-2 > exim 4.76-1 > > email is looking for /usr/lib/sendmail. > exim-config creates /usr/sbin/sendmail -> /usr/bin/exim. > > I wonder whether most Unix applications don't expect /usr/lib/sendmail, >

exim-config, email, probably more: what is the expected path to sendmail?

2011-10-16 Thread Regid Ichira
email 3.1.2-2 exim 4.76-1 email is looking for /usr/lib/sendmail. exim-config creates /usr/sbin/sendmail -> /usr/bin/exim. I wonder whether most Unix applications don't expect /usr/lib/sendmail, and not /usr/sbin/sendmail. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.

Re: Sendmail linked to cronlog?

2010-07-01 Thread Refr Bruhl
That makes better sense. Just when you are not expecting it and the logic is not clear... }:O> - Original Message From: Pierre A. Humblet To: Refr Bruhl ; Cygwin Mail List Sent: Thu, July 1, 2010 12:33:48 PM Subject: Re: Sendmail linked to cronlog? - Original Mess

Re: Sendmail linked to cronlog?

2010-07-01 Thread Pierre A. Humblet
- Original Message - From: "Refr Bruhl" To: "Cygwin Mail List" Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2010 13:01 Subject: Sendmail linked to cronlog? | Ok this is just humorous | | While configure was running for mailutils 2.1 I noticed sendmail was in /usr/sbin | | Thinking

Re: Sendmail linked to cronlog?

2010-07-01 Thread Larry Hall (Cygwin)
On 7/1/2010 1:01 PM, Refr Bruhl wrote: Ok this is just humorous :-D While configure was running for mailutils 2.1 I noticed sendmail was in /usr/sbin Thinking that odd, I had not seen a sendmail option in the set up options I did an ls on it Its pointing to /usr/bin/cronlog? So you&#x

Sendmail linked to cronlog?

2010-07-01 Thread Refr Bruhl
Ok this is just humorous While configure was running for mailutils 2.1 I noticed sendmail was in /usr/sbin Thinking that odd, I had not seen a sendmail option in the set up options I did an ls on it Its pointing to /usr/bin/cronlog? crth at lkvn108 in /downloads/mail/mailutils-2.1 # ls

Re: Sendmail

2009-12-16 Thread Chip Panarchy
hi On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 12:49 AM, Erhard Wagner wrote: > Hi > > > -- > Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html > FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/ > Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html > Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple >

Sendmail

2009-12-16 Thread Erhard Wagner
Hi -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

Re: [REQ] Please package SendMail for Cygwin

2009-12-10 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Dec 10 08:56, Chip Panarchy wrote: > What's the procedure to get a package hosted on Cygwin, then > subsequently listed in the installer? http://cygwin.com/setup.html Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin

Re: [REQ] Please package SendMail for Cygwin

2009-12-09 Thread Chip Panarchy
Hmm... interesting. The reason I wanted SendMail is that the author of RANCID said that I'd require SendMail & Cron in order to successful utilise his software. I'm happy to package RANCID for Cygwin, from my Vista computer (which doesn't have Compiler errors). What'

Re: [REQ] Please package SendMail for Cygwin

2009-12-09 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 03:09:37PM -0500, Paul McFerrin wrote: >On another side note... >There is a product from sourceforge.net called "msmtp" which can be >configured either as a smtp client or as a replacement for sendmail. I >myself downloaded the sources and suces

Re: [REQ] Please package SendMail for Cygwin

2009-12-09 Thread Paul McFerrin
On another side note... There is a product from sourceforge.net called "msmtp" which can be configured either as a smtp client or as a replacement for sendmail. I myself downloaded the sources and sucessfully compiled it all under cygwin 1.7-67. I've been using msmtp as a smtp

Re: [REQ] Please package SendMail for Cygwin

2009-12-08 Thread Andy Koppe
2009/12/8 Chip Panarchy: > As I'm still having compilation problems, could someone else please > create a SendMail package for Cygwin? While waiting for that to happen, have a look at exim, or – in case all you actually need is forwarding to a remote server – ssmtp. Andy -- Prob

[REQ] Please package SendMail for Cygwin

2009-12-08 Thread Chip Panarchy
Good Morning, As I'm still having compilation problems, could someone else please create a SendMail package for Cygwin? (built into the setup as well as providing the binaries) Thanks in advance, Panarchy -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ:

Re: cron without sendmail generates bogus logfile names

2008-09-10 Thread Linus Hicks
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 6:26 PM, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote: > > Try running the mailer script through 'd2u'. If that doesn't work, > it suggests a difference in the environment for the cron service > versus your interactive shell. Any chance you have another, Win32- > native "date" hanging around?

Re: cron without sendmail generates bogus logfile names

2008-09-09 Thread Larry Hall (Cygwin)
Linus Hicks wrote: The "poor man's mailer" included as part of the cron package uses the following construct to generate part of the filename used in making log file names: DATE=$(date '+%Y%m%d_%H%M%S') It then generates the filename as: FILE="/tmp/cron.$DATE.$$.log" However, it seems to be t

cron without sendmail generates bogus logfile names

2008-09-09 Thread Linus Hicks
[EMAIL PROTECTED] log $ FILE="/tmp/cron.$DATE.$$.log" [EMAIL PROTECTED] log $ echo $FILE /tmp/cron.20080909_170639.6588.log [EMAIL PROTECTED] log $ ls -l /usr/sbin/sendmail lrwxrwxrwx 1 oracle None 16 Jul 3 15:00 /usr/sbin/sendmail -> /usr/bin/cronlog* [EMAIL PROTECTED] log $ Here&#

Re: RE:Using mutt to sendmail via remote SMTP

2008-08-10 Thread Jake Thompson
On Sun, 2008-08-10 at 20:17 -0400, Reid Thompson wrote: > On Mon, 2008-08-11 at 04:32 +0700, bjoe wrote: > > Thank for the answer, > > > > I finally find tutorial in http://www.andrews-corner.org regarding this > > subject, and successfully sending this mail with mutt. I just want to share > > t

Re: RE:Using mutt to sendmail via remote SMTP

2008-08-10 Thread Reid Thompson
On Mon, 2008-08-11 at 04:32 +0700, bjoe wrote: > Thank for the answer, > > I finally find tutorial in http://www.andrews-corner.org regarding this > subject, and successfully sending this mail with mutt. I just want to share > this link. > > This tutorial point me to using mutt as MUA, msmtp as

Re: RE:Using mutt to sendmail via remote SMTP

2008-08-10 Thread bjoe
Thank for the answer, I finally find tutorial in http://www.andrews-corner.org regarding this subject, and successfully sending this mail with mutt. I just want to share this link. This tutorial point me to using mutt as MUA, msmtp as MTA to send mail, fetchmail to retrieve mail from POP serve

Re: RE:Using mutt to sendmail via remote SMTP

2008-08-07 Thread Reid Thompson
recently i found that I can run > >> >> cygwin with my USB, so I wonder how to use cygwin MUA like mutt to > >> >> sending mail via gmail. As far in my research mutt look for sendmail > >> >> program in exim or other smtp program running in localhost to

RE:Using mutt to sendmail via remote SMTP

2008-08-07 Thread bjoe
, so I wonder how to use cygwin MUA like mutt to >> >> sending mail via gmail. As far in my research mutt look for sendmail >> >> program in exim or other smtp program running in localhost to sending >> >> mail, and this is not suite to my purpose. > > > >

Re: Using mutt to sendmail via remote SMTP

2008-08-03 Thread r
ike mutt to >> sending mail via gmail. As far in my research mutt look for sendmail >> program in exim or other smtp program running in localhost to sending >> mail, and this is not suite to my purpose. > > Yes, that's the way mutt works. mutt still uses the distinction b

Re: Using mutt to sendmail via remote SMTP

2008-08-03 Thread Spiro Trikaliotis
Hello, * On Sun, Aug 03, 2008 at 04:56:56PM +0700 Bayu Adiwibowo wrote: > I using thunderbird to send this mail, recently i found that I can run > cygwin with my USB, so I wonder how to use cygwin MUA like mutt to > sending mail via gmail. As far in my research mutt look for sendmail >

Using mutt to sendmail via remote SMTP

2008-08-03 Thread Bayu Adiwibowo
I using thunderbird to send this mail, recently i found that I can run cygwin with my USB, so I wonder how to use cygwin MUA like mutt to sending mail via gmail. As far in my research mutt look for sendmail program in exim or other smtp program running in localhost to sending mail, and this is not

Re: Problem with /usr/sbin/sendmail ==> /usr/bin/exim

2006-11-27 Thread René Berber
Pierre A. Humblet wrote: >>It doesn't quite work, the link created is still "sendmail.exe -> >>/usr/bin/exim.exe". >> >>But this works: `ln -s /usr/bin/exim. /usr/sbin/sendmail` > > Thanks, but did you update to coreutils-6.6-2 ? > Otherwise

Re: Problem with /usr/sbin/sendmail ==> /usr/bin/exim

2006-11-27 Thread René Berber
Pierre A. Humblet wrote: > Some programs, most notably cron, expect /usr/sbin/sendmail > to point to mailer program such as exim or ssmtp. > > Due to a buggy "ln -s" (now fixed in coreutils-6.6-2, thanks to Eric Blake), > a link /usr/sbin/sendmail.exe was sometimes creat

Problem with /usr/sbin/sendmail ==> /usr/bin/exim

2006-11-27 Thread Pierre A. Humblet
Some programs, most notably cron, expect /usr/sbin/sendmail to point to mailer program such as exim or ssmtp. Due to a buggy "ln -s" (now fixed in coreutils-6.6-2, thanks to Eric Blake), a link /usr/sbin/sendmail.exe was sometimes created to point to /usr/bin/exim.exe, which does not

RE: /usr/bin/email causes error "sh: /usr/lib/sendmail: No such file or directory"

2006-05-21 Thread David Christensen
AIL PROTECTED]: Please enter your Reply-to: email address []: Enter 1 to use sendmail or 2 to use a SMTP server [1]: Please enter the sendmail command line [/usr/sbin/sendmail -t -i]: Please check the configuration file /etc/email/email.conf for correctness. 2006-05-21 23:28:51 [EMAIL PROTEC

Re: /usr/bin/email causes error "sh: /usr/lib/sendmail: No such file or directory"

2006-05-21 Thread Christopher Faylor
t fails: > >2006-05-21 15:13:46 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ >$ cat foo >test message. >line 2 >bye. > >2006-05-21 15:14:02 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ >$ /usr/bin/email -s test [EMAIL PROTECTED] < foo > >E-Mail Sent >sh: /usr/lib/sendmail: No

/usr/bin/email causes error "sh: /usr/lib/sendmail: No such file or directory"

2006-05-21 Thread David Christensen
. line 2 bye. 2006-05-21 15:14:02 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ /usr/bin/email -s test [EMAIL PROTECTED] < foo E-Mail Sent sh: /usr/lib/sendmail: No such file or directory It looks like I'm missing a library (/usr/lib/sendmail). Looking for a Cygwin package containing this fil

Re: Plausibility of sendmail?

2004-02-15 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Sun, Feb 15, 2004 at 01:55:44PM -0800, AG wrote: >>Sounds to me like you want to read up on exim <http://www.exim.org/> to >>see what it can do and if it will work for you. Discussion of exim's >>capabilities compared to sendmail is really off-topic for this

Re: Plausibility of sendmail?

2004-02-15 Thread AG
> Sounds to me like you want to read up on exim <http://www.exim.org/> to > see what it can do and if it will work for you. Discussion of exim's > capabilities compared to sendmail is really off-topic for this list. Agreed. But as I responded to Brian earlier in pri

Re: Plausibility of sendmail?

2004-02-15 Thread Robert R Schneck
g > to an SMTP server; I need a mail transport agent that can queue > outgoing mail for several different outgoing mail servers. In principle ssmtp is a drop-in replacement from sendmail, but it doesn't have full sendmail functionality; it will ignore or bomb on most command-line option

RE: Plausibility of sendmail?

2004-02-15 Thread Larry Hall
At 02:17 AM 2/15/2004, AG you wrote: >I didn't want to send this to the whole [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list, >but when I googled for "cygwin sendmail" Brian's email asking why >in the world anyone would want to run sendmail on cygwin came up >first. > >Here&#

RE: Plausibility of sendmail?

2004-02-14 Thread AG
I didn't want to send this to the whole [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list, but when I googled for "cygwin sendmail" Brian's email asking why in the world anyone would want to run sendmail on cygwin came up first. Here's why I am interested: (0) I am *not* interested in

Re: Plausibility of sendmail?

2004-02-10 Thread Brian Dessent
Joaquin wrote: > > But Exim provides a sendmail-compatible interface, and a > > symlink to /usr/sbin/sendmail. Anything that expects to call > > sendmail from the command line should work fine with Exim, > > including all those perl modules. Even if you are doing &g

RE: Plausibility of sendmail?

2004-02-10 Thread Joaquin
> But Exim provides a sendmail-compatible interface, and a > symlink to /usr/sbin/sendmail. Anything that expects to call > sendmail from the command line should work fine with Exim, > including all those perl modules. Even if you are doing > something obscure that absolutely re

Re: Plausibility of sendmail?

2004-02-06 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Fri, Feb 06, 2004 at 06:31:02AM -0800, Karl M wrote: >There were some strong opinions expressed on both sides about whether >sendmail is a good thing or not...but the bottom line is that no one >has offered to maintain sendmail as a package under Cygwin. If you >want to do that, I

RE: Plausibility of sendmail?

2004-02-06 Thread Karl M
Hi All... There were some strong opinions expressed on both sides about whether sendmail is a good thing or not...but the bottom line is that no one has offered to maintain sendmail as a package under Cygwin. If you want to do that, I don't think that anyone would stop you. There is pres

Re: Plausibility of sendmail?

2004-02-06 Thread Brian Dessent
Joaquin wrote: > Lastly, my professor REQUIRED us to use sendmail for our Perl > CGI/DBI/mail projects. There was no choice in the matter. The code > would be deployed on the college system, which is a Linux system. My > development machine is a small tiny VIAO laptop running Wi

RE: Plausibility of sendmail?

2004-02-05 Thread Joaquin
On another angle for this discussion. Consider that for one M$ $FU 3.5 has sendmail. Before this many commercial solutions charging quite a lot of $$ for sendmail under Windows. Microsoft even compiled a version of sendmail for the earliest versions of Windows NT 3.51 long ago and posted it on

RE: Plausibility of sendmail?

2004-02-05 Thread Joaquin
test client-server scripts/programs using a lot of Open Source, some on cygwin, some outside of cygwin. I would want to test a REAL sendmail program for these development scenarios. Lastly, my professor REQUIRED us to use sendmail for our Perl CGI/DBI/mail projects. There was no choice in the matter.

Re: Plausibility of sendmail?

2004-02-02 Thread Brian . Kelly
> Andrew DeFaria wrote: > If they are so clueless as you suggest then one has to wonder why you > tell them that you're running a Linux OS and using sendmail?!? They "know" that Linux is *open source* and *dangerous* - because that's what the VERY political Serv

Re: Plausibility of sendmail?

2004-02-02 Thread Andrew DeFaria
, but now the *manager* has promised his/her management that this new functionality would be ready by week's end - without consulting the guru's first. So cygwin is agreed to as a *temporary* solution (with the understanding that temporary in such organizations could be two decades instead of thre

RE: Plausibility of sendmail?

2004-02-02 Thread Ken Thompson
As far as whether it gets in the cygwin distribution, it is primarily a function of whether someone is willing to port it to cygwin and maintain it. Otherwise, it won't. Someone asks about sendmail for cygwin periodically but I have never seen anyone express an interest in actually doin

Re: Plausibility of sendmail?

2004-02-02 Thread Brian Dessent
for future > reference. Of course a lot of reasons that *crap* persists is because > there's a lot of folks who are familiar with and experienced with such > *crap*. For someone under the gun to come up with a quick fix, inevitably > they will attempt to implement the familiar

Re: Plausibility of sendmail?

2004-02-02 Thread Brian . Kelly
s that *crap* persists is because there's a lot of folks who are familiar with and experienced with such *crap*. For someone under the gun to come up with a quick fix, inevitably they will attempt to implement the familiar. If sendmail REALLY deserves to die, then keeping it out of the Cygwi

Re: Plausibility of sendmail?

2004-02-02 Thread Brian Dessent
t now the > *manager* has promised his/her management that this new functionality would > be ready by week's end - without consulting the guru's first. So cygwin is > agreed to as a *temporary* solution (with the understanding that temporary > in such organizations could be tw

Re: Plausibility of sendmail?

2004-02-02 Thread Brian . Kelly
"Brian Dessent" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@cygwin.com on 02/02/2004 01:10:44 AM Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To:"'Cygwin List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc: Subject:Re: Plausibility of sendmail? >> If yo

Re: Plausibility of sendmail?

2004-02-01 Thread Brian Dessent
Joaquin wrote: > > I check the FAQ and I couldn't find any reference to this. I noticed > that exim is there, kewl!, but what about sendmail? Was there any work > on porting this? > > BTW, I noticed that SFU3.5 seems to have a version of sendmail. Maybe you could elabor

Plausibility of sendmail?

2004-02-01 Thread Joaquin
I check the FAQ and I couldn't find any reference to this. I noticed that exim is there, kewl!, but what about sendmail? Was there any work on porting this? BTW, I noticed that SFU3.5 seems to have a version of sendmail. - Joaquin -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubs

Re: exim 4.20.x patch to handle sendmail -O switch

2003-06-11 Thread Philip Hazel
On Tue, 10 Jun 2003, Jason Pyeron wrote: > Dear Sirs/Madams, > > Please find enclosed patches for your respective distributions. These > patches allow exim to not fail on sendmail like switch -O. Thanks, Jason. I've added it to my list of things to look at. Regards, Philip

exim 4.20.x patch to handle sendmail -O switch

2003-06-10 Thread Jason Pyeron
Dear Sirs/Madams, Please find enclosed patches for your respective distributions. These patches allow exim to not fail on sendmail like switch -O. In send mail the -O switch allows configuration options to be set via the command line to override the .conf settings. Its general syntax is: -O

RE: getting cron to work -> status too large for sendmail?

2003-05-28 Thread Hannu E K Nevalainen \(garbage mail\)
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf > Of Pierre A. Humblet > Another option is to keep your script and have it call ssmtp, > either filtering out > the environment values or putting them in the body of the message. $ env -i ssmtp ... /Hannu E K Nevalainen, Mariefred, Swed

Re: getting cron to work -> status too large for sendmail?

2003-05-27 Thread Pierre A. Humblet
On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 04:08:34PM -0700, linda w (cyg) wrote: > > Perhaps one problem might be that in addition to the normal WinXP env vars that would > be defined for a user, I started cron from one of my cygwin shell windows, so it > would > have inherited all of the env vars from personal lo

RE: getting cron to work -> status too large for sendmail?

2003-05-27 Thread linda w \(cyg\)
te as it is told to. However -- since I was getting the error -- SENDMAIL message, I put a small shell script in "/usr/sbin/sendmail"s place: law/bin> ll /usr/sbin/sendmail* -rwxr-xr-x 1 law Domain A 26 May 27 04:19 /usr/sbin/sendmail* lrwxrwxrwx 1 law Domain A

RE: getting cron to work -> status too large for sendmail?

2003-05-27 Thread Harig, Mark
cron does not use sendmail for mail delivery. It uses a small program call ssmtp. Before trying to get cron to send email, be sure that it is working properly without it. Try a simple cron job such as: * * * * * pwd >> /tmp/pwd.txt or * * * * * /usr/bin/date >> /tmp/

getting cron to work -> status too large for sendmail?

2003-05-27 Thread linda w \(cyg\)
environment as Header lines: X-Cron-Env: X-Cron-Env: ...[78 more lines of Environment Variable listing] This causes sendmail to fail since apparently sendmail has a 4000 character limit in the header. I don't know that I've seen cron include the entire environment as header lines before