Re: Seems like a bug with mkfifo -m

2020-05-28 Thread yoshi kakbudto
you say 'ls' is a problem source. Then i have to be more specific with the problem to not miss any other possible problems around it. My use case is this: I have an ssh rsa keys dynamically loaded in environment variables. Those variables then expaned and piped to the named pipe and then the pipe

Re: Seems like a bug with mkfifo -m

2020-05-28 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On May 28 13:39, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote: > On 5/28/2020 1:31 PM, yoshi kakbudto wrote: > > you say 'ls' is a problem source. Then i have to be more specific with the > > problem to not miss any other possible problems around it. > > > > My use case is this: I have an ssh rsa keys dynamically

Re: Seems like a bug with mkfifo -m

2020-05-28 Thread Ken Brown via Cygwin
On 5/28/2020 1:31 PM, yoshi kakbudto wrote: you say 'ls' is a problem source. Then i have to be more specific with the problem to not miss any other possible problems around it. My use case is this: I have an ssh rsa keys dynamically loaded in environment variables. Those variables then expaned

Re: Seems like a bug with mkfifo -m

2020-05-28 Thread Ken Brown via Cygwin
On 5/28/2020 11:28 AM, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote: On 5/28/2020 10:52 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: On May 28 09:16, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote: On 5/28/2020 4:12 AM, Дмитрий Есарев via Cygwin wrote: Hi, all When i ran cygwin 2.x, i used mkfifo -m 0600 file to create a named pipe with no user

Re: Seems like a bug with mkfifo -m

2020-05-28 Thread Ken Brown via Cygwin
On 5/28/2020 10:52 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: On May 28 09:16, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote: On 5/28/2020 4:12 AM, Дмитрий Есарев via Cygwin wrote: Hi, all When i ran cygwin 2.x, i used mkfifo -m 0600 file to create a named pipe with no user and group permissions. in the latest cygwin the abo

Re: Seems like a bug with mkfifo -m

2020-05-28 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On May 28 09:16, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote: > On 5/28/2020 4:12 AM, Дмитрий Есарев via Cygwin wrote: > > Hi, all > > > > When i ran cygwin 2.x, i used mkfifo -m 0600 file to create a named pipe > > with no user and group permissions. > > > > in the latest cygwin the above command creates device

Re: Seems like a bug with mkfifo -m

2020-05-28 Thread Ken Brown via Cygwin
On 5/28/2020 4:12 AM, Дмитрий Есарев via Cygwin wrote: Hi, all When i ran cygwin 2.x, i used mkfifo -m 0600 file to create a named pipe with no user and group permissions. in the latest cygwin the above command creates device with 0644 permissions. And i cant drop it to 0600: cygcheck.exe -V

Seems like a bug with mkfifo -m

2020-05-28 Thread Дмитрий Есарев via Cygwin
Hi, all When i ran cygwin 2.x, i used mkfifo -m 0600 file to create a named pipe with no user and group permissions. in the latest cygwin the above command creates device with 0644 permissions. And i cant drop it to 0600: cygcheck.exe -V cygcheck (cygwin) 3.1.4 $ umask 0077 $ touch somefile;