On Tue, 15 May 2018 at 00:49, Steven Penny wrote:
> fact. example is the Git package, which as of this writing is totally up
to
> date:
> - http://cygwin.mirrors.hoobly.com/x86_64/release/git
> - http://github.com/git/git/releases
I've been avoiding this thread as I haven't had anything productiv
I'm moving this to the Cygwin-Talk list.
On 5/14/2018 7:48 PM, Steven Penny wrote:
> On Mon, 14 May 2018 10:31:18, cyg Simple wrote:
>> And you a free to do so. MinGW isn't GCC
>
> yes it is. when you compile GCC, as i have done:
>
> http://github.com/svnpenn/glade/blob/master/mingw-w64-x86-64
On Mon, 14 May 2018 10:31:18, cyg Simple wrote:
because they have merit? i said that already.
Since you stated in the form of a question, I can say for me, they do
not and based on the conversation of others, not for anyone but you.
let me rephrase: they have merit, full stop. Example 1, quo
On 5/6/2018 10:08 AM, Steven Penny wrote:
> On Sun, 6 May 2018 00:54:23, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
>> The question is, if you actually understand your comments are not
>> appreciated, why do you insist on making them anyway?
>
> because they have merit? i said that already.
>
Since you stated in t
On Sun, 6 May 2018 00:54:23, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
The question is, if you actually understand your comments are not
appreciated, why do you insist on making them anyway?
because they have merit? i said that already.
GCC as an example is a fast updating package.
No, not really.
its fast
On 2018-05-05 01:56, Steven Penny wrote:
> On Sat, 5 May 2018 07:27:22, Marco Atzeri wrote:
>> Jon Yong is doing an hell of job taming a monster program,
>> and your comments are NOT appropriated.
>
> certainly not by you - and probably others on this list.
The question is, if you actually unders
On 5 May 2018 at 02:56, Steven Penny wrote:
> On Sat, 5 May 2018 07:27:22, Marco Atzeri wrote:
>>
>> I am still waiting that you show your code.
>
>
> i did, here, i can do it again:
>
> http://github.com/svnpenn
>
>> Jon Yong is doing an hell of job taming a monster program,
>
>
> no one is argui
On Sat, 5 May 2018 07:27:22, Marco Atzeri wrote:
I am still waiting that you show your code.
i did, here, i can do it again:
http://github.com/svnpenn
Jon Yong is doing an hell of job taming a monster program,
no one is arguing that, i agree its a tough package to maintain
and your comme
On 5/5/2018 2:56 AM, Steven Penny wrote:
On Fri, 4 May 2018 15:16:49, Marco Atzeri wrote:
I do not see you doing any package activity release, so you should
refrain to
comment on how we (package maintainers) use our own spare time for this
project.
such comments are perfectly acceptable if ma
On 2018-05-04 18:56, Steven Penny wrote:
> sorry, did you really just invoke fortran as a serious argument? fortran is
> arguably the oldest programming language still in use, if you can even call it
> that. you can't even do HTTP with it:
> http://rosettacode.org/wiki/HTTPS#Fortran
That's what we
On Fri, 4 May 2018 15:16:49, Marco Atzeri wrote:
I do not see you doing any package activity release, so you should refrain to
comment on how we (package maintainers) use our own spare time for this
project.
such comments are perfectly acceptable if maintainers are acting in bad faith
with rega
On 5/4/2018 2:09 PM, Steven Penny wrote:
On Fri, 4 May 2018 00:05:23, Brian Inglis wrote:
For an understaffed, all-volunteer effort, Cygwin does a tremendous job
providing us with a compatible, reliable, stable subsystem working
environment,
running in a less stable environment.
Cygwin seems t
On Fri, 4 May 2018 00:05:23, Brian Inglis wrote:
For an understaffed, all-volunteer effort, Cygwin does a tremendous job
providing us with a compatible, reliable, stable subsystem working environment,
running in a less stable environment.
Cygwin seems to keep up to date with stable releases of im
On 2018-05-03 17:16, Steven Penny wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Feb 2018 12:51:36, Steven Penny wrote:
>> Please release new Cygwin Ruby. Current version is 2.3.6 (Dec 2017), and
>> since
>> then 2 versions have dropped [1]:
>> - 2.4.3 (Dec 2017)
>> - 2.5.0 (Dec 2017)
>> 2.4.0 introduced Enumerable#sum [2],
On 2018-05-03 18:16, Steven Penny wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Feb 2018 12:51:36, Steven Penny wrote:
>> Please release new Cygwin Ruby. Current version is 2.3.6 (Dec 2017),
>> and since
>> then 2 versions have dropped [1]:
>>
>> - 2.4.3 (Dec 2017)
>> - 2.5.0 (Dec 2017)
>>
>> 2.4.0 introduced Enumerable#sum
On Sat, 24 Feb 2018 12:51:36, Steven Penny wrote:
Please release new Cygwin Ruby. Current version is 2.3.6 (Dec 2017), and since
then 2 versions have dropped [1]:
- 2.4.3 (Dec 2017)
- 2.5.0 (Dec 2017)
2.4.0 introduced Enumerable#sum [2], would be nice to have.
[1] http://github.com/ruby/ruby/t
Please release new Cygwin Ruby. Current version is 2.3.6 (Dec 2017), and since
then 2 versions have dropped [1]:
- 2.4.3 (Dec 2017)
- 2.5.0 (Dec 2017)
2.4.0 introduced Enumerable#sum [2], would be nice to have.
[1] http://github.com/ruby/ruby/tags
[2] http://stackoverflow.com/a/41235616
--
Pr
17 matches
Mail list logo
