https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fbit.ly%2F2tNpG88&sa=D&sntz=1&usg=AFQjCNH_FmGDnetg9VVdecluxUc8aIb7Ow
/From: Leonard Russo/
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwi
Greetings, L A Walsh!
> Andrey Repin wrote:
>> When executed this oneliner over Samba 4.3 network share, it takes 5 seconds
>> to match the newly created hardlink.
>> I'm wondering if this is Cygwin, Samba or Windows networking issue?
>>
>
> BTW -- found the cause of this:
>Under:
> H
Andrey Repin wrote:
When executed this oneliner over Samba 4.3 network share, it takes 5 seconds
to match the newly created hardlink.
I'm wondering if this is Cygwin, Samba or Windows networking issue?
BTW -- found the cause of this:
Under:
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\System\CurrentControlSet\
On 20/05/2017 01:39, Andrey Repin wrote:
I've tried to disable NetBIOS over TCP/IP on client for all adapters
active, but nothing has changed.
You could always try using Wireshark to get more insight as to what is
causing the delay.
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ
Andrey Repin wrote:
Greetings, All!
_a=fileA;
_b=fileB;
[ ! -f "$_a" ] && touch "$_a";
[ ! -f "$_b" ] && ln "$_a" "$_b";
for i in $(seq 1 10);
do sleep 1;
[ "$_a" -ef "$_b" ] && { echo Timed in $i; break;}; done;
rm "$_a" "$_b"
When executed this oneliner over Samba 4.3 network share,
Greetings, Richard H Lee!
> On 19/05/2017 23:01, Richard H Lee wrote:
>> On 19/05/2017 22:37, Andrey Repin wrote:
>>> When executed this oneliner over Samba 4.3 network share, it takes 5
>>> seconds to match the newly created hardlink. I'm wondering if this is
>>> Cygwin, Samba or Windows networki
On 19/05/2017 23:01, Richard H Lee wrote:
On 19/05/2017 22:37, Andrey Repin wrote:
When executed this oneliner over Samba 4.3 network share, it takes 5
seconds to match the newly created hardlink. I'm wondering if this is
Cygwin, Samba or Windows networking issue?
I think it's something to do
On 19/05/2017 22:37, Andrey Repin wrote:
When executed this oneliner over Samba 4.3 network share, it takes 5
seconds to match the newly created hardlink. I'm wondering if this is
Cygwin, Samba or Windows networking issue?
I think it's something to do with windows name resolution.
Try running:
>More details, please. What OS is PC1? What OS is PC2? Both are running
>the snapshot DLL now, right? Please paste the output you get on the
>command line into your reply. And don't hesitate to paste the German
>output in the GUI error box into that reply either. Coincidentally I
>understand
On Mon, 7 Jun 2004 15:38:21 +0100 (GMT Daylight Time), Alastair Growcott wrote:
> To all those who said it couldn't be done...I've done it :)
I'll update the FAQ with this info. Including cgf's link to the GNU website. :)
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem
To all those who said it couldn't be done...I've done it :)
Hahahaha.
Seriously, it is quite easy once you figure it out, and I am sure there are plenty of
people who helped write Cygwin who probably knew but couldn't be bothered to tell me.
It involves a couple of minor hacks. It would be nice
> -Original Message-
> From: Pavel Tsekov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 2:31 AM
> To: Robert Collins
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re[5]: setup-2.243 Crash / Install from Local
> Directory / WinXP
>
>
> Hello Robert
Hello Robert,
Well, this will fix the problem, but String::substr() will still
cause a crash if for some reason a NULL pointer is passed to it!
Btw have you read my mail till the end ?
Wednesday, May 22, 2002, 4:57:13 PM, you wrote:
RC> Thanks Pavel. I've no time to test this tonight, but:
[sn
13 matches
Mail list logo
