It is normal and was normal for at least seventeen years.
That's a blatant lie.
It never happened to me before, and I doubled checked this by installing
the older 2.3. It didn't happen before 2.4.
You'd be surprized… But the actual answer is "yes".
I actually am surprised since you seem to
Which warning do you mean here?
The "permissions out of order" one. This was not the case before, at
least not on my installation, so I don't see how this can be called
normal.
Come on, be fair. The new ACL handling started out early 2015, got a
break when I realized that it doesn't work
It was always the case.
Permissions are NOT REQUIRED to be ordered in a specific way, but
Explorer is
only capable of editing them in the only one way.
Means, Explorer is deficient. Explorer. Not Windows. Windows is
perfectly
capable of handling the Cygwin ACL in the intended way.
No, it re
Not sure what Transmission is, but files downloaded with POSIX
tools are usually not executable. For instance, download Cygwin's
setup-x86.exe with wget. Then try to execute it. It won't since
the permissions are set according to your umask and without execute
permissions, e.g., 0644. This i
I'm not quite sure what you observe there. The NULL SID ACE only
contains extra information about some POSIX bits and the MASK value.
It's existence and setting should not influence what you can do with
the
file. The permission bits are explicitely set elsewhere in the ACL.
Can you reproduc
5 matches
Mail list logo
