>Either that or you are just hitting "Reply" instead of "Reply-All". Further
>discussion of this is OT for this list though so if you have further comments
>that you'd like to share, you'll need to follow-up on the cygwin-talk list.
>Larry Hall http://www.rfk.com
Corr
On 05/27/2006, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Sat, May 27, 2006 at 01:57:36AM -0500, Vidiot wrote:
>> >>There is nothing wrong with this mail list, although it may not
conform to
>> >>your personal preference. This list does not dictate to the sender
where
>> >>replies will go. It leaves that u
On Sat, May 27, 2006 at 01:57:36AM -0500, Vidiot wrote:
>>There is nothing wrong with this mail list, although it may not conform to
>>your personal preference. This list does not dictate to the sender where
>>replies will go. It leaves that up to the sender. If posters want email
>>to go to the
On Sat, May 27, 2006 at 01:25:24AM -0400, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
>On 05/26/2006, Vidiot wrote:
>>[Can the listmaster fix the mail list so that it sends the reply back
>>to the list and not to the poster? I sent the e-mail before
>>remembering that this mail list gets it wrong, at least AFAIAC.
>There is nothing wrong with this mail list, although it may not conform to
>your personal preference. This list does not dictate to the sender where
>replies will go. It leaves that up to the sender. If posters want email
>to go to the list rather than to them, it's simply a matter of setting t
On 05/26/2006, Vidiot wrote:
[Can the listmaster fix the mail list so that it sends the reply back to
the list and not to the poster? I sent the e-mail before remembering that
this mail list gets it wrong, at least AFAIAC.]
There is nothing wrong with this mail list, although it may not confo
IT WORKS!!!
The original problem with the "-a 0" being a combined value was it. When I
separated them, I get the echo into the log correct for the new variable
names, but had a typo for for one of them in the actual command launch.
Thanks for the pointer/tip.
Onward and upward.
MB
--
e-mail:
[Can the listmaster fix the mail list so that it sends the reply back to the
list and not to the poster? I sent the e-mail before remembering that this
mail list gets it wrong, at least AFAIAC.]
>Vidiot doesn't really state how zsh fails, so I'd really like more
>details as to what he's seeing.
On Fri, 26 May 2006, Dave Korn wrote:
On 26 May 2006 06:29, Vidiot wrote:
But, if anyone has a clue as to why starting of a Windblows program from
a Z-shell doesn't work, yet from a shell-script, it does, I'd certainly
appreciate knowing.
Well, isn't it going to be because sh and zsh are di
>I think that the problem is the difference between ZSH's parameter
>expansion and sh's parameter expansion. I think that your $MUX gets
>expanded into single parameter "-a 0", instead of two parameters "-a"
>and "0", that you expect.
I separated MUX into two separate variables. Believe it or not
On 26 May 2006 06:29, Vidiot wrote:
> But, if anyone has a clue as to why starting of a Windblows program from
> a Z-shell doesn't work, yet from a shell-script, it does, I'd certainly
> appreciate knowing.
Well, isn't it going to be because sh and zsh are different shells with
different syntax
An added tidbit. I turned the LOG script into a Z-shell script by changing
the first line to "#!/usr/bin/zsh" and tsreader started just fine.
It is the main Z-shell script that is having trouble starting tsreader and I
have no clue why.
MB
--
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
12 matches
Mail list logo
