On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 11:32 AM, Fred Kemp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks to all who have replied so far - as Herb says, the cygwin+sshd+rsync
> combo is extremely useful, not least in that it allows my client PC's to
> simply run sshd as a very efficient (ie resource unintensive) background
Thanks to all who have replied so far - as Herb says, the cygwin+sshd
+rsync combo is extremely useful, not least in that it allows my
client PC's to simply run sshd as a very efficient (ie resource
unintensive) background service, requiring no further user
intervention (A Good Thing™). Wor
On 19 Nov 2008 09:54:41 EST, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 07:24:33AM -0500, Brett Serkez wrote:
> >I spent considerable time on this and reported were the problem is
> >occurring to no avail, don't waste your time. In a nutshell the issue
> >is with Cygwin's bi-directional p
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 9:54 AM, Christopher Faylor
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Your analysis of the problem is likely incorrect.
I think we are saying the same thing, if you like your explanation
better, that is fine with me.
> Nevertheless, the problem is still there and as always PGA. I have
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 07:24:33AM -0500, Brett Serkez wrote:
>I spent considerable time on this and reported were the problem is
>occurring to no avail, don't waste your time. In a nutshell the issue
>is with Cygwin's bi-directional pipe emulation, this is a fundamental
>feature of all UNIXies.
On Nov 19 07:24, Brett Serkez wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 6:54 AM, Fred Kemp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > In the meantime, if anyone has any ideas as to where the problem lies, I
> > would be willing to spend some time investigating it further. It does seem
> > to be a longstanding issue, wi
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 6:54 AM, Fred Kemp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Ged,
>
> Thanks for the info, due to being on a University campus, we are restricted
> in what we are allowed to set up and VPN's are one of those explicitly
> mentioned :-( However, since OsX has a built in VPN server, I wi
Hi Ged,
Thanks for the info, due to being on a University campus, we are
restricted in what we are allowed to set up and VPN's are one of those
explicitly mentioned :-( However, since OsX has a built in VPN server,
I will perhaps have a covert test of this if I can get rsyncd to play
nice
Hi there,
On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 Fred Kemp wrote:
> ... Unfortunately our data files are frequently in the 3-4Gb range
> so it sounds like SFU is unlikely to be an option either.
>
> Would like to persist with cygwin as we use it for some of our
> proteomics tools. I guess I'll have to ditch the sec
Hi Steve,
Hmmm, thanks for confirming what I pessimistically suspected but
optimistically hoped to be corrected on. Unfortunately our data files
are frequently in the 3-4Gb range so it sounds like SFU is unlikely to
be an option either.
Would like to persist with cygwin as we use it for s
rsync over ssh and cygwin don't play nice and likely never will. Either
avoid using rsync or use it in daemon mode avoiding ssh which is where
the problem really lies ( the interaction between rsync and ssh ).
A good alternative to cygwin for this is SFU but be aware that most
versions only suppo
11 matches
Mail list logo
