Re: on the road to 1.5.19 - snapshot testing needed

On Thu, 29 Sep 2005, Christopher Faylor wrote: > The latest snapshot is chock full of developer goodness and needs to > be tested. > * * * > I'm asking, once again, for people to test the latest cygwin snapshot. > The snapshot that is currently available should be very cl

Re: on the road to 1.5.19 - snapshot testing needed

Volker Quetschke wrote: I thought so, it was only the parent. Unfortunately the client shown from ps (pid 1780) or the client from task manager (pid 480 and shown with 100% cpu) were not attachable to. There were no other relevant processes. s/client/child/ Doh! -- PGP/GPG key (ID: 0x9F8A785D)

Re: on the road to 1.5.19 - snapshot testing needed

(snip) PIDPPIDPGID WINPID TTY UIDSTIME COMMAND 512 1 512512 con 1003 23:52:18 /usr/bin/rxvt 680 512 6807520 1003 23:52:18 /usr/bin/bash 2324 6802324 23360 1003 23:52:23 /usr/bin/bash 2492 12492

Re: on the road to 1.5.19 - snapshot testing needed

On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 09:36:39PM -0400, Volker Quetschke wrote: >I got another hang. This time on one of my own systems so that I might be >able >to reproduce it better. > >The symptoms are different this time. I have a sh.exe running on 100% cpu >load in the task manager with PID 480 that is no

Re: on the road to 1.5.19 - snapshot testing needed

I got another hang. This time on one of my own systems so that I might be able to reproduce it better. The symptoms are different this time. I have a sh.exe running on 100% cpu load in the task manager with PID 480 that is not mentioned in the ps output. The usual "ls /proc/*/fd" doesn't help thi

Re: on the road to 1.5.19 - snapshot testing needed

Christopher Faylor wrote: On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 10:09:58PM -0400, Volker Quetschke wrote: P.S.: We (?) will try the next snapshot ASAP, unfortunately this means in this case on the next weekday (monday). I added new debugging and a new locking mechanism to the latest snapshot. It's possible

Re: on the road to 1.5.19 - snapshot testing needed

On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 10:09:58PM -0400, Volker Quetschke wrote: >P.S.: We (?) will try the next snapshot ASAP, unfortunately this >means in this case on the next weekday (monday). I added new debugging and a new locking mechanism to the latest snapshot. It's possible that the new locking may fi

Re: cygstart regression [Was: Re: on the road to 1.5.19 - snapshot testing needed]

On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 07:40:55PM +0200, Michael Schaap wrote: >> Doesn't work. >> >> >That makes it unlikely that it's really running out of memory. Must be >that "system error", then... It might be a windows "system heap" problem. See: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2005-09/msg00945.

Re: cygstart regression [Was: Re: on the road to 1.5.19 - snapshot testing needed]

On 3-Oct-2005 18:56, Aaron Humphrey wrote: > On 10/2/05, Michael Schaap wrote: > >> To be able to check whether something has changed in the path handling, >> I've uploaded a version of cygstart that prints out the exact >> ShellExecute call it is making, at >>

Re: cygstart regression [Was: Re: on the road to 1.5.19 - snapshot testing needed]

On 10/2/05, Michael Schaap wrote: > To be able to check whether something has changed in the path handling, > I've uploaded a version of cygstart that prints out the exact > ShellExecute call it is making, at > . Could you perhaps download > that, try it out

Re: cygstart regression [Was: Re: on the road to 1.5.19 - snapshot testing needed]

On 1-Oct-2005 5:28, Eric Blake wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Charles Wilson on 9/30/2005 10:07 AM: cygstart was contributed by Michael Schapp, who is still around but doesn't post often. cygstart, aside from its option handling, is a very simple app. The

Re: cygstart regression [Was: Re: on the road to 1.5.19 - snapshot testing needed]

On 30-Sep-2005 18:07, Charles Wilson wrote: Christopher Faylor wrote: On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 09:17:06AM -0600, Aaron Humphrey wrote: I just did some version testing on the cygstart .mdb problem I reported a few days ago(http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2005-09/msg00923.html), and it is indeed a r

Re: on the road to 1.5.19 - snapshot testing needed

On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 10:09:58PM -0400, Volker Quetschke wrote: >Christopher Faylor wrote: >>The latest snapshot is chock full of developer goodness and needs to >>be tested. >> >>Both Corinna and I spent a lot of time trying to track down the reported >>fork() problems. We didn't fix them* but

Re: cygstart regression [Was: Re: on the road to 1.5.19 - snapshot testing needed]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Charles Wilson on 9/30/2005 10:07 AM: > > cygstart was contributed by Michael Schapp, who is still around but > doesn't post often. cygstart, aside from its option handling, is a very > simple app. The core routine just uses the Windows

Re: on the road to 1.5.19 - snapshot testing needed

On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 07:34:58PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: >On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 05:08:10PM -0500, Brian Ford wrote: >>On Fri, 30 Sep 2005, Brian Ford wrote: >>> On Thu, 29 Sep 2005, Christopher Faylor wrote: >>> > So, once again, I'd like to finally release this thing and so I'm asking

Re: on the road to 1.5.19 - snapshot testing needed

On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 05:08:10PM -0500, Brian Ford wrote: >On Fri, 30 Sep 2005, Brian Ford wrote: >> On Thu, 29 Sep 2005, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> > So, once again, I'd like to finally release this thing and so I'm asking >> > for testing help. You all should know the drill by now but, just

Re: cygstart regression [Was: Re: on the road to 1.5.19 - snapshot testing needed]

On Sep 30 12:07, Charles Wilson wrote: > Christopher Faylor wrote: > >On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 09:17:06AM -0600, Aaron Humphrey wrote: > > > >>I just did some version testing on the cygstart .mdb problem I reported a > >>few > >>days ago(http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2005-09/msg00923.html), and it is

Re: on the road to 1.5.19 - snapshot testing needed

On Thu, 29 Sep 2005, Christopher Faylor wrote: > So, once again, I'd like to finally release this thing and so I'm asking > for testing help. You all should know the drill by now but, just in case > you don't: This isn't a recent regression, and it may not even be supported, but I thought I'd re

cygstart regression [Was: Re: on the road to 1.5.19 - snapshot testing needed]

Christopher Faylor wrote: On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 09:17:06AM -0600, Aaron Humphrey wrote: I just did some version testing on the cygstart .mdb problem I reported a few days ago(http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2005-09/msg00923.html), and it is indeed a regression from 1.5.18. Cygstart works fine wi

Re: on the road to 1.5.19 - snapshot testing needed

On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 09:17:06AM -0600, Aaron Humphrey wrote: >I just did some version testing on the cygstart .mdb problem I reported a few >days ago(http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2005-09/msg00923.html), and it is >indeed a regression from 1.5.18. Cygstart works fine with 1.5.18, but as >early as

Re: on the road to 1.5.19 - snapshot testing needed

I just did some version testing on the cygstart .mdb problem I reported a few days ago(http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2005-09/msg00923.html), and it is indeed a regression from 1.5.18. Cygstart works fine with 1.5.18, but as early as the 20050909 snapshot(as far back as I have)it fails on MDB files.

Re: on the road to 1.5.19 - snapshot testing needed

On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 10:06:15AM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >On Sep 30 01:13, Eric Blake wrote: >> Regression from 1.5.18 (probably within the last week, but I can't pinpoint >> which snapshot): On Win98, 20050929 fails to recognize directories >> on remote drives: >> >> $ df -T g: >> Files

Re: on the road to 1.5.19 - snapshot testing needed

On Sep 30 05:57, Eric Blake wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > > > > I'm asking, once again, for people to test the latest cygwin snapshot. > > The snapshot that is currently available should be very close to an > > official release of cygwin version 1.5.19. > > does n

Re: on the road to 1.5.19 - snapshot testing needed

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > > does not define getdelim() or getline(), although they are > provided in cygwin.din. While I can't say that this is a regression from > 1.5.18, it is causing problems for coreutils-5.90 (coreutils-5.3.0 only > checked if they would link, but cor

Re: on the road to 1.5.19 - snapshot testing needed

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > > I'm asking, once again, for people to test the latest cygwin snapshot. > The snapshot that is currently available should be very close to an > official release of cygwin version 1.5.19. does not define getdelim() or getline(), although they are

Re: on the road to 1.5.19 - snapshot testing needed

On Sep 30 01:13, Eric Blake wrote: > Regression from 1.5.18 (probably within the last week, but I can't pinpoint > which snapshot): On Win98, 20050929 fails to recognize directories > on remote drives: > > $ df -T g: > FilesystemType 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on > g: us

RE: on the road to 1.5.19 - snapshot testing needed

A cvs pull of wxWindows configured and built fine here. -- Gary R. Van Sickle > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Christopher Faylor > Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 6:13 PM > To: cygwin@cygwin.com > Subject: on the road to 1.5.1

Re: on the road to 1.5.19 - snapshot testing needed

On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 07:13:21PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: > I'm asking, once again, for people to test the latest cygwin snapshot. > The snapshot that is currently available should be very close to an > official release of cygwin version 1.5.19. > > Please report success or failure to thi