On Jan 2 17:27, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 12:34:03PM -0800, Brian Dessent wrote:
> >David Christensen wrote:
> >> When I create a file using notepad:
> >> Look at it using "wc":
> >>
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ wc textfile.txt
> >> 2 14 76 t
> > ? By one of the two ways God intended when he gave Moses POSIX:
> >
> > 1. O_BINARY
> > 2. "rb"
>
> Umm, that's not what I think of as "by default". I call that
> "hardcoded".
Right: hardcoded to work properly by default.
--
Gary R. Van Sickle
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin
On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 05:48:21PM -0800, Brian Dessent wrote:
>Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
>>>I thought we were talking about 'od' here where presumably you always
>>>want to open files for reading in binary mode? (And as far as I know
>>>od doesn't write anything, redirection aside...)
>>
>>'
Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
> > I thought we were talking about 'od' here where presumably you always
> > want to open files for reading in binary mode? (And as far as I know od
> > doesn't write anything, redirection aside...)
>
> 'twas redirection I was thinking of:
>
> $ od /dev/null>od.o
On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 05:16:40PM -0800, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
>On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 05:58:47PM -0600, "Gary R. Van Sickle" wrote:
>>>On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 05:27:45PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 12:34:03PM -0800, Brian Dessent wrote:
>This means t
On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 05:29:21PM -0800, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 05:28:35PM -0800, Brian Dessent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
Sorry for the inadvertent email address there.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:
On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 05:28:35PM -0800, Brian Dessent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
>
> > > > ? By one of the two ways God intended when he gave Moses POSIX:
> > > >
> > > > 1. O_BINARY
> > > > 2. "rb"
> > >
> > > (3. link with binmode.o)
> >
> > Wouldn't binmode
Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
David Christensen wrote:
And then look at it with Cygwin "od", I see:
Obviously you used an old buggy version of od.
Hmm, I don't get it.
Resolved.
Gerrit
--
=^..^=
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/pro
Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
> > > ? By one of the two ways God intended when he gave Moses POSIX:
> > >
> > > 1. O_BINARY
> > > 2. "rb"
> >
> > (3. link with binmode.o)
>
> Wouldn't binmode.o change it to not output crlf to text mounts?
> Probably wouldn't be a good choice.
I thought we were
On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 04:54:16PM -0800, Brian Dessent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> "Gary R. Van Sickle" wrote:
>
> > > > I think that this is a regression of "od", though. It
> > > probably should
> > > > use binmode by default.
> > >
> > > I would tend to agree, but how would you change this
Brian Dessent wrote:
David Christensen wrote:
cygwin:
When I create a file using notepad:
This is a text file created with Notepad.
It has DOS (CRLF) line endings.
Look at it using "wc":
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ wc textfile.txt
2 14 76 textfile.txt
And then look at i
On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 05:58:47PM -0600, "Gary R. Van Sickle" wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 05:27:45PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> > > On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 12:34:03PM -0800, Brian Dessent wrote:
> > > >This means that when a cygwin program reads a file with
> > CRLF endings
> > >
"Gary R. Van Sickle" wrote:
> > > I think that this is a regression of "od", though. It
> > probably should
> > > use binmode by default.
> >
> > I would tend to agree, but how would you change this default
> > if desired?
> >
>
> ? By one of the two ways God intended when he gave Moses POSIX:
> On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 05:27:45PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 12:34:03PM -0800, Brian Dessent wrote:
> > >This means that when a cygwin program reads a file with
> CRLF endings
> > >it is translated to LF line endings that all unix tools
> expect. You
> > >w
On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 05:27:45PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 12:34:03PM -0800, Brian Dessent wrote:
> >This means that when a cygwin program reads a file with CRLF endings it
> >is translated to LF line endings that all unix tools expect. You want
> >binary mounts
On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 12:34:03PM -0800, Brian Dessent wrote:
>David Christensen wrote:
>>
>> cygwin:
>>
>> When I create a file using notepad:
>>
>> This is a text file created with Notepad.
>> It has DOS (CRLF) line endings.
>>
>> Look at it using "wc":
>>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTE
David Christensen wrote:
>
> cygwin:
>
> When I create a file using notepad:
>
> This is a text file created with Notepad.
> It has DOS (CRLF) line endings.
>
> Look at it using "wc":
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ wc textfile.txt
> 2 14 76 textfile.txt
>
> A
od -xIntel processors are little endian.
cheers,
-Matt Smith
The od utility doesn't seem to behaving properly. With the -x option, it
reverses bytes e.g. 5245 4f43 when it should be 4552 434f. With no options,
I can detect no correspondence to the actual input data and no pattern
whatsoever.
Randall R Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Sir,
>
> You have got to be kidding.
22:53:33 fred@appel:~$ uname -a
Linux appel.lilypond.org 2.4.18-pre9-benh #1 Sat Feb 16 20:51:15 CET 2002 ppc
unknown
22:53:37 fred@appel:~$ echo http > http
22:53:43 fred@appel:~$ od -bcx http
Hi, Heribert,
Ahh, yes, my old friend dd and his funky command syntax (inspired by some
old IBM command language, if I'm not mistaken). The Swiss Army Knife of
Unix data transfer. Thanks for reminding me.
However, I don't see a 4-byte equivalent to "conv=swab" in the manual page,
so this will
])
> -Original Message-
> From: Randall R Schulz [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 17:56
> To: David; Mark Himsley
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: od
>
> Sir,
>
> You have got to be kidding.
>
> For the record, t
David -
I agree with you that the little-endian representation can be somewhat
confusing; however, as Mark pointed out, it's not likely to ever
change...
I've had my own "struggles" with od's idea of output formats, and have
come up with a few options along the way. Here's some that will help,
On Tue, 19 Feb 2002 14:03:55 GMT you wrote:
> > > Then, I run od -bcx and I get:
> > >
> > > 110 124 124 120 012 000
> > > H T T P \n \0
> > > 5448 5054 000a
> >
> > That is correct in this little-endian platform, see
> > http://info.astrian.net/jargon/terms/l/little-endian.html
>
> I
At 09:03 AM 2/19/2002, David wrote:
>Hi Mark,
>
>Thank you for your reply to my message about the od utility: I wrote:
>
> >> I created at test file with 4 characters in it:
> >>
> >> HTTP
> >>
> >> Then, I run od -bcx and I get:
> >>
> >> 110 124 124 120 012 000
> >> H T T
Sir,
You have got to be kidding.
For the record, the x86 architecture is little-endian, PowerPC, e.g., is
bid-endian. On the off chance that you're running Windows NT (and
Cygwin???) on an Alpha, I have to admit I don't know which byte ordering it
uses.
You will get the 16-bit output you wan
- Original Message -
From: "David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Mark Himsley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 06:03
Subject: Re: od
> > >You can see that the hex values in the last line are revers
Hi Mark,
Thank you for your reply to my message about the od utility: I wrote:
>> I created at test file with 4 characters in it:
>>
>> HTTP
>>
>> Then, I run od -bcx and I get:
>>
>> 110 124 124 120 012 000
>> H T T P \n \0
>> 5448 5054 000a
You wrote:
> That is cor
On Fri, 15 Feb 2002 14:06:27 GMT you wrote:
>I created at test file with 4 characters in it:
>
> HTTP
>
>Then, I run od -bcx and I get:
>
>110 124 124 120 012 000
> H T T P \n \0
>5448 5054 000a
That is correct in this little-endian platform, see
http://info.astrian.net/jargon/ter
28 matches
Mail list logo
