Re: named pipe (fifo) question

2011-04-20 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 09:48:09AM -0400, bob 295 wrote: >(I'm on the list in digest mode so things can't thread easily) > >On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 11:01:55AM -0400, bob 295 wrote: >>>I'm porting a library from Linux to Cygwin and I've encountered a problem >with >>>the behavior of named pipes (f

Re: named pipe (fifo) question

2011-04-20 Thread bob 295
(I'm on the list in digest mode so things can't thread easily) On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 11:01:55AM -0400, bob 295 wrote: >>I'm porting a library from Linux to Cygwin and I've encountered a problem with >>the behavior of named pipes (fifo's). >>... >>Is this the intended POSIX behavior? Is the p

Re: named pipe (fifo) question

2011-04-19 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 11:01:55AM -0400, bob 295 wrote: >I'm porting a library from Linux to Cygwin and I've encountered a problem with >the behavior of named pipes (fifo's). >... >Is this the intended POSIX behavior? Is the problem the RDWR open? The problem is that Cygwin's implementation o