Richard Foulk wrote:
Richard Foulk wrote:
Give mount(1) nonexistent hosts or directories and it will complain,
but it still populates the mount table as if it succeeded.
It also always returns zero, for success or failure.
Cygwin's mount is a different bird than on Unix. It really is just a m
> Richard Foulk wrote:
> > Give mount(1) nonexistent hosts or directories and it will complain,
> > but it still populates the mount table as if it succeeded.
> >
> > It also always returns zero, for success or failure.
>
> Cygwin's mount is a different bird than on Unix. It really is just a map
On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 02:34:53AM -1000, Richard Foulk wrote:
>Give mount(1) nonexistent hosts or directories and it will complain,
>but it still populates the mount table as if it succeeded.
>
>It also always returns zero, for success or failure.
Correct.
cgf
--
Unsubscribe info: http://c
Richard Foulk wrote:
Give mount(1) nonexistent hosts or directories and it will complain,
but it still populates the mount table as if it succeeded.
It also always returns zero, for success or failure.
Cygwin's mount is a different bird than on Unix. It really is just a mapping
table of POSI
4 matches
Mail list logo
