On Sun, Apr 06, 2008 at 12:55:02PM +0900, wynfield wrote:
>Brian Dessent wrote:
>>Build gettext yourself if you want a newer version. This is FOSS,
>>you're not helpless.
>
>Brian, its known at times, that you make really lame statements, but
>the one above is beneath even you, I thought.
Actuall
Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 04, 2008 at 07:56:15PM -0700, Brian Dessent wrote:
> >Build gettext yourself if you want a newer version. This is FOSS,
> >you're not helpless.
>
> TIFYNH. I like it.
>
> cgf
Chris, you must not have been fully coherent when you wro
Brian Dessent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > My question is the usage of "cygport" really required to be used. I
> > certainly
> Of course it's not required. The maintainer can use any method he
> wants. The fact that Chuck switched *to* cygport from the previous
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Sat, Apr 05, 2008 at 11:45:12AM +0200, Eric Lilja wrote:
Brian Dessent wrote:
[snip]
Sorry for this hijack but, Brian, is there in a fact a mail adress
brian {at} dessent {dot} net and do you check it or are you simply
ignoring the questions I mailed you? ;)
If yo
On Sat, Apr 05, 2008 at 11:45:12AM +0200, Eric Lilja wrote:
> Brian Dessent wrote:
> [snip]
>Sorry for this hijack but, Brian, is there in a fact a mail adress
>brian {at} dessent {dot} net and do you check it or are you simply
>ignoring the questions I mailed you? ;)
If you are asking private cy
Brian Dessent wrote:
[snip]
Sorry for this hijack but, Brian, is there in a fact a mail adress brian
{at} dessent {dot} net and do you check it or are you simply ignoring
the questions I mailed you? ;)
- Eric
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:
On Fri, Apr 04, 2008 at 07:56:15PM -0700, Brian Dessent wrote:
>Build gettext yourself if you want a newer version. This is FOSS,
>you're not helpless.
TIFYNH. I like it.
cgf
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.ht
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> My question is the usage of "cygport" really required to be used. I
> certainly
Of course it's not required. The maintainer can use any method he
wants. The fact that Chuck switched *to* cygport from the previous
homegrown g-b-s method he used should tell you someth
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just as the person below noted that the latest version of gettext, 0.17
was needed, I found myself also needing it. I expect that more and more
newer versions and updates will be requiring it.
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2008-03/msg00220.html
The current cygwin gettext
9 matches
Mail list logo
