Re: gcc4.4

Vincent R. wrote: >> And then after that. I'll probably be more inclined to go > straight >> for >> a test version of 4.5.0, and skip over 4.4 series altogether. > > Is there any reason to ignore 4.4 family ? Main reason, as Eric suggests, is time. I've had to prepare and test a big

Re: gcc4.4

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Vincent R. on 9/11/2009 6:54 AM: >> And then after that. I'll probably be more inclined to go > straight >> for >> a test version of 4.5.0, and skip over 4.4 series altogether. > > Is there any reason to ignore 4.4 family ? Lack

Re: gcc4.4

On Thu, 10 Sep 2009 23:30:59 +0100, Dave Korn wrote: > Vincent R. wrote: >> Hi, >> >> when will you release a gcc-4.4 package for cygwin ? >> > > Right now I'm concentrating on getting a stable 4.3.4 package out that > will > have all the fixes for all the known problems in 4.3.2 and will b

Re: gcc4.4

Vincent R. wrote: > Hi, > > when will you release a gcc-4.4 package for cygwin ? > Right now I'm concentrating on getting a stable 4.3.4 package out that will have all the fixes for all the known problems in 4.3.2 and will be the first fully production-ready version. (I've been struggling wit