Brian Dessent wrote:
Ken Dibble wrote:
As you can see, there are indeed some directories, but a whole bunch of
files
which shouldn't be there as well.
The big question now is why are some files considered directories?
I don't see the confusion here. You're feeding to "ls -l" the
parame
Ken Dibble wrote:
> As you can see, there are indeed some directories, but a whole bunch of
> files
> which shouldn't be there as well.
>
> The big question now is why are some files considered directories?
I don't see the confusion here. You're feeding to "ls -l" the
parameters "./" , "./files
Randall R Schulz wrote:
Ken,
At 16:38 2003-07-07, Ken Dibble wrote:
Ok, I'm an idiot. I've looked in the FAQ, searched the mail lists
and checked sundry Unix sources (no, not the source code).
Well, I doubt greatly that you're an idiot. Confusion is the prelude
to enlightenment, after all.
Ken Dibble wrote:
> I can't make sense of this.
>
> $ find ./ -mtime -1 -print | wc -l
> 55
>
> $ find ./ -mtime -1 -exec ls -l '{}' \; | wc -l
> 2046
Try running "find . -mtime -1" (-print is assumed) and look at the
output. In addition to files, find returns directories that match th
Ken,
At 16:38 2003-07-07, Ken Dibble wrote:
Ok, I'm an idiot. I've looked in the FAQ, searched the mail lists
and checked sundry Unix sources (no, not the source code).
Well, I doubt greatly that you're an idiot. Confusion is the prelude to
enlightenment, after all...
(Compare that with Eudora
5 matches
Mail list logo