At 06:20 AM 12/12/2005 -0700, Eric Blake wrote:
>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>Hash: SHA1
>
>According to Krzysztof Duleba on 12/12/2005 3:35 AM:
>>
>> And ln -s -f a b produces b ==> a if a.exe doesn't exist yet.
>
>You are correct that the behavior of cygwin ln in the presence of symlinks
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Krzysztof Duleba on 12/12/2005 3:35 AM:
>
> And ln -s -f a b produces b ==> a if a.exe doesn't exist yet.
You are correct that the behavior of cygwin ln in the presence of symlinks
has not been consistent in the past. I think the curren
Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
I still don't understand how the .exe got to appear...
What I observe here is that if a.exe exists, then
ln -s a b produces b.exe ==> a.exe (weird to me)
However ln -s a.exe b produces b ==>a.exe
So that explains how sendmail.exe appears when
exim.exe exists, but doesn'
- Original Message -
From: "Krzysztof Duleba"
To:
Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2005 2:02 PM
Subject: Re: exim 4.54-1 and broken symlinks
Krzysztof Duleba wrote:
Hum, I just installed the latest exim on a new machine and can't
reproduce
what you describe. exim
Krzysztof Duleba wrote:
Hum, I just installed the latest exim on a new machine and can't
reproduce
what you describe. exim-config created
lrwxrwxrwx 1 p-humblet sw 13 Dec 8 10:10 /usr/sbin/sendmail ->
/usr/bin/exim*
(no .exe anywhere) , as one would expect from the line
ln -s -f /usr/b
Pierre A. Humblet
Hum, I just installed the latest exim on a new machine and can't
reproduce
what you describe. exim-config created
lrwxrwxrwx 1 p-humblet sw 13 Dec 8 10:10 /usr/sbin/sendmail ->
/usr/bin/exim*
(no .exe anywhere) , as one would expect from the line
ln -s -f /usr/bin/exi
- Original Message -
From: "Krzysztof Duleba"
To:
Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2005 7:36 AM
Subject: exim 4.54-1 and broken symlinks
Hi
There's something wrong with exim package and exim-config. It creates
/usr/sbin/sendmail.exe, which links to /bin/exim.exe, which doesn't exist.
T
7 matches
Mail list logo
