Re: displaying Chinese radicals

2011-10-15 Thread Andy Koppe
On 13 October 2011 22:17, Lingyis wrote: > There is a so-called "last resort" font used in Mac (supposedly in Windows > as well) so I suppose that's how Mac deals with them. > > If so, how do I make sure cygwin uses the "last resort font", i.e. where do > I put/install that font? Windows doesn't h

Re: displaying Chinese radicals

2011-10-15 Thread Andy Koppe
On 15 October 2011 00:55, Kaz Kylheku wrote: > > Lingyis writes: >> >> cygwin xterm or rxvt does a good job when it comes to displaying Chinese >> characters, but it doesn't have fonts for all the Chinese radicals.  maybe >> half of them show up as "SQUARES".  the ones that do show up i can tell >>

Re: displaying Chinese radicals

2011-10-14 Thread Kaz Kylheku
Lingyis writes: cygwin xterm or rxvt does a good job when it comes to displaying Chinese characters, but it doesn't have fonts for all the Chinese radicals. maybe half of them show up as "SQUARES". the ones that do show up i can tell cygwin did some substitutions--i.e. dug up other fonts when

Re: displaying Chinese radicals

2011-10-14 Thread Kaz Kylheku
Wynfield writes: Linguis, The "radicals" you speak of are only a component part of a Chinese character and not the character itself, just as the little dot above > a lower case 'I' is not an alphabet and doesn't have a code. Oops! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Kangxi_radicals "

Re: displaying Chinese radicals

2011-10-13 Thread Lingyis
Thanks for the response. I know this is a font issue, so let me paste what I get on the Mac terminal: 1 一 yī 2 丨 gǔn 3 丶 zhǔ 4 丿 piě 5 乙 jué ⺃ ⺂ ⺄ These are the first 5 radicals (I have generated all 214 of them) and their variants (to the right, they all have their unicode codepoints and

Re: displaying Chinese radicals

2011-10-13 Thread wynfield
Linguis, The "radicals" you speak of are only a component part of a Chinese character and not the character itself, just as the little dot above a lower case 'I' is not an alphabet and doesn't have a code. If there is an encoding for the radical / which even if it is one of the few tha