>> I am using the latest version of Cygwin (1.5.5-1) on a Windows XP box on
a
>> domain (tried several fixes pertaining to changing the rights of
>> the cygwin
>> dir and whole c drive - Everybody full control).
>>
>> The problem is no command substitution works (using `'s or $()'s).
>>
>> After a
> From: Geoffrey Ruscoe
> Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 8:05 PM
> I am using the latest version of Cygwin (1.5.5-1) on a Windows XP box on a
> domain (tried several fixes pertaining to changing the rights of
> the cygwin
> dir and whole c drive - Everybody full control).
>
> The problem is no co
I'm not sure if this is the same problem, but after searching and searching
this was the closest problem I've found (also other references to the setup
post-install scripts problem).
I am using the latest version of Cygwin (1.5.5-1) on a Windows XP box on a
domain (tried several fixes pertaining t
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 09:35:38AM -0500, Jason Dufair wrote:
>Thanks a lot for this, Christopher. I sit in awe of the efforts of
>everyone to fix this extremely tricky bug.
As with most bugs, it turned out to be extremely simple to fix once all
of the parameters were known. I appreciate all of
Thanks a lot for this, Christopher. I sit in awe of the efforts of
everyone to fix this extremely tricky bug.
Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 04:30:12PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>I just managed to duplicate the problem on my system at work.
>>
>>
I've just checked the patch a wee bit closer - it looks OK to me. If you want
to push it upstream, please go ahead :)
I'm wrapping up release -16 now. I'll make it available for upload on -apps
ASAP.
Thanks,
rlc
On Sat, Oct 18, 2003 at 01:58:36AM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Wed, Oct
I'll apply your patch and release a new Bash version shortly
rlc
On Sat, Oct 18, 2003 at 01:58:36AM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 04:30:12PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >I just managed to duplicate the problem on my system at work.
> >
> >Stay tuned.
>
> I ma
> -Original Message-
> From: Hannu E K Nevalainen
> Sent: 18 October 2003 13:22
> Subject: RE: cygpath hangings: A fix - bash patch enclosed -- bash
> maintainer please note!
>
> The simple test works flawlessly.
>
ditto
> I've run my setup-b
> if anyone wants to try this. It would be good to confirm or deny
> that this fixes the problem for everyone.
I tried the posted simple shell script with the old and new bash.exe. Worked
exactly as you predicted...
Hung with the old, didn't hang (i.e. worked) with the new.
cygcheck output atta
> From: Christopher Faylor
> Sent: Saturday, October 18, 2003 8:06 AM
> I've put a patched version of bash up at:
>
> ftp://sourceware.org/pub/cygwin/tmp/bash.exe
>
> if anyone wants to try this. It would be good to confirm or deny
> that this fixes the problem for everyone.
>
> Btw, maybe this h
Christopher Faylor writes:
> >
> I've put a patched version of bash up at:
>
> ftp://sourceware.org/pub/cygwin/tmp/bash.exe
>
> if anyone wants to try this. It would be good to confirm or deny
> that this fixes the problem for everyone.
>
> Btw, maybe this has already been mentioned, but here
On Sat, Oct 18, 2003 at 01:58:36AM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 04:30:12PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>I just managed to duplicate the problem on my system at work.
>>
>>Stay tuned.
>
>I managed to duplicate it at home by booting into W2K, too. That meant
>I did
On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 04:30:12PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>I just managed to duplicate the problem on my system at work.
>
>Stay tuned.
I managed to duplicate it at home by booting into W2K, too. That meant
I didn't have to feel guilty about working on this at work. :-)
This should fi
I must be going senile. I just managed to duplicate the problem on my
system at work. I could have sworn that I tried this several times to
no avail.
Stay tuned.
cgf
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Docume
On Wed, 15 Oct 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> I'd be more interested in "cygcheck cygpath" output in the two
> different cases. That would tell us which DLLs were being loaded.
>
No difference. For the stripped down MINGW version of cygpath:
Found: .\cyghan.exe
cyghan.exe
D:\WINNT\System32
On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 09:19:14AM +0100, Steve Fairbairn wrote:
>
>All,
>
>As a side note, I have 11 copies of that DLL (java dev and runtime, Visual
>Studio/Source Safe, ...) on my system, but only the system32 one is in my
>normal path.
>
>Someone mentioned something about possible issues to do
On Wed, 15 Oct 2003, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Oct 2003, Brian Ford wrote:
> > On Tue, 14 Oct 2003, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> > >Brian Ford wrote:
> > > > There will be no ouput unless main calls foo, right?
> > >
> > > Actually, if the DLL was loaded, there should be output even if f
On Tue, 14 Oct 2003, Brian Ford wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Oct 2003, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> >Brian Ford wrote:
> > > There will be no ouput unless main calls foo, right?
> >
> > Actually, if the DLL was loaded, there should be output even if foo isn't
> > called...
> >
> Just linking to it causes a l
> -Original Message-
> From: Steve Fairbairn
> Sent: 15 October 2003 09:19
> Subject: RE: cygpath hangings
>
> I ran this first with my normal bash shell, renamed the
> output, and then ran
> it again from within setup.
>
> I am attaching the 2 files as t
All,
As a side note, I have 11 copies of that DLL (java dev and runtime, Visual
Studio/Source Safe, ...) on my system, but only the system32 one is in my
normal path.
Someone mentioned something about possible issues to do with the path being
different, so I thought I'd run a quick test.
---
$
On Tue, 14 Oct 2003, Brian Ford wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Oct 2003, chris wrote:
>
> > If I comment out the call to SHGetPathFromIDList in this program, the
> > program returns, else it hangs.
> >
> Confirmed.
>
> > Also, This program seems to be both valid c++ and c code. If it is
> > compiled in gcc,
Chris,
On Tue, 14 Oct 2003, chris wrote:
> If I comment out the call to SHGetPathFromIDList in this program, the
> program returns, else it hangs.
>
Confirmed.
> Also, This program seems to be both valid c++ and c code. If it is
> compiled in gcc, all is fine. In g++, it hangs.
>
Really? I see
On Tue, 14 Oct 2003, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> Does "cygcheck yourprog.exe" show both test_dll.dll and SHLWAPI.DLL?
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~
$ cygcheck cyghan.exe
Found: .\cyghan.exe
cyghan.exe
G:\cygwin\bin\cygwin1.dll
D:\WINNT\System32\KERNEL32.dll
D:\WINNT\System32\ntdll.dll
.\cygl.d
On Tue, 14 Oct 2003, Brian Ford wrote:
> Igor,
>
> On Tue, 14 Oct 2003, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 14 Oct 2003, chris wrote:
> >
> > > -- Code begins --
> > >
> > > #include
> > >
> > > void fee (void) {
> > > char *buf;
> > > LPITEMIDLIST id;
> > > SHGetPathFromIDList (id, buf)
Igor,
On Tue, 14 Oct 2003, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Oct 2003, chris wrote:
>
> > -- Code begins --
> >
> > #include
> >
> > void fee (void) {
> > char *buf;
> > LPITEMIDLIST id;
> > SHGetPathFromIDList (id, buf);
> > }
> >
> > int main (int argc, char **argv)
> > {
> > ret
> From: Igor Pechtchanski
> Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2003 3:38 PM
> FWIW, I've posted instructions on how to run a program from setup recently
> (but can't find the actual message at the moment). To summarize, simply
> create a shell script named BLAH.sh that calls that program (you may need
>
On Tue, 14 Oct 2003, chris wrote:
> Chris,
>
> >I suspect that this hang might be happening while loading the DLL. Could
> >you try to link your program with something like below and see if it still
> >hangs, and what it outputs? If it doesn't hang, try renaming
> >SHGetPathFromIDList below to s
Steve Fairbairn wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Cliff Hones
Sent: 14 October 2003 15:03
Subject: Re: cygpath hangings
Running
cygcheck -vs (and/or some other such utility) from
a hanging and non-hanging postinstall shell might come
up with something.
As in set up a script in /etc
Chris,
I suspect that this hang might be happening while loading the DLL. Could
you try to link your program with something like below and see if it still
hangs, and what it outputs? If it doesn't hang, try renaming
SHGetPathFromIDList below to something else (e.g., foo) that calls the
real SHGe
Steve Fairbairn wrote:
> As in set up a script in /etc/postinstall that runs cygcheck -vs to a file,
> and send that in?
I would suggest setting up the script to send to a file, invoking
it twice by running setup from explorer and from a command line,
and if there is any difference send that in.
> -Original Message-
> From: Cliff Hones
> Sent: 14 October 2003 15:03
> Subject: Re: cygpath hangings
>
> Running
> cygcheck -vs (and/or some other such utility) from
> a hanging and non-hanging postinstall shell might come
> up with something.
>
I'm surprised that this problem seems so intractable.
While careful debugging and analysis ought to get to
the root of the problem eventually, there is clearly
some difficulty in getting a suitable debug session
without upsetting what is being examined. [Heisenberg
at work.] So alternate approach
On Tue, 14 Oct 2003, Steve Fairbairn wrote:
> [snip]
> I have suffered from the hanging cygpath issue, I did a clean install (new
> box) and have since not changed the installation. If you could supply me
> with an exe for this code (private email) or the flags used when building
> that code and
On Tue, 14 Oct 2003, chris wrote:
> I decided to try to put some investigation into the cygpath crashings
> that have been reported so much. Here are my findings.. I hope this
> helps! I'd be happy to try further debuggings, except I couldn't figure
> out how to attach a debugger to the program (b
> From: chris
> Sent: 14 October 2003 13:33
> Subject: Re: cygpath hangings
>
> Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>
> >
> >Nope, not for me. Are you, by any chance, still using gcc2?
> >
> >
> Nope, using gcc 3.3.1 (cygming special)
>
> Just ch
On Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 01:33:03PM +0100, chris wrote:
> Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >Nope, not for me. Are you, by any chance, still using gcc2?
> >
> Nope, using gcc 3.3.1 (cygming special)
>
> Just checking... have you been suffering from the "cygpath" crashing
> during setup? If not I imagine
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 12:44:57PM +0100, chris wrote:
Also, This program seems to be both valid c++ and c code. If it is
compiled in gcc, all is fine. In g++, it hangs.
[...]
If there is anything else anyone would like me to try (like taking a -E
and picking out all t
On Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 12:44:57PM +0100, chris wrote:
> Also, This program seems to be both valid c++ and c code. If it is
> compiled in gcc, all is fine. In g++, it hangs.
> [...]
> If there is anything else anyone would like me to try (like taking a -E
> and picking out all the useless bits of
38 matches
Mail list logo
