Re: bogus PATH transformations in bash 2.05a.0(3)-release w/cygwin 1.3.10

2002-05-22 Thread Kevin Layer
>> Your /usr/bin and /usr/lib mounts are incorrect. There were some problems >> with that with some versions of setup.exe, but I think that has been fixed >> now. I had the latest version of setup.exe (as of yesterday). I decided to remove cygwin, even cleaning out `cygwin' references in the

Re: bogus PATH transformations in bash 2.05a.0(3)-release w/cygwin 1.3.10

2002-05-22 Thread Michael A Chase
On Wed, 22 May 2002 09:27:06 -0700 Kevin Layer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Your /usr/bin and /usr/lib mounts are incorrect. There were some problems > >> with that with some versions of setup.exe, but I think that has been fixed > >> now. > > I had the latest version of setup.exe (as of y

Re: bogus PATH transformations in bash 2.05a.0(3)-release w/cygwin 1.3.10

2002-05-22 Thread Kevin Layer
>> Just to make sure I understand. After doing a complete reinstall with the >> latest setup.exe, the mounts are now correct? Please confirm that with >> 'cygcheck -s' so I can put this to bed in my mind at least. Yes, reinstall with cleaning the registry. I've been a long time cygwin user, g

RE: bogus PATH transformations in bash 2.05a.0(3)-release w/cygwin 1.3.10

2002-05-22 Thread Schaible, Jorg
Hi Kevin, > D:\bug>PATH C:\Cygwin\bin;c:\cygwin\usr\bin;C:\Cygwin\usr\local\bin [...] > D:\bug>path > PATH=c:\cygwin\bin;c:\cygwin\\bin;c:\cygwin\usr\local\bin although this is a bug, why don't you omit for now the /usr/bin from the path anyway ? /usr/bin is mounted to /bin and represents

Re: bogus PATH transformations in bash 2.05a.0(3)-release w/cygwin 1.3.10

2002-05-21 Thread Michael A Chase
On Tue, 21 May 2002 20:38:23 -0700 Kevin Layer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> What does cygcheck -s say? > > Cygwin Win95/NT Configuration Diagnostics > Current System Time: Tue May 21 20:37:06 2002 > > Windows 2000 Professional Ver 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2 > > Path:C:\ODI\OStore

Re: bogus PATH transformations in bash 2.05a.0(3)-release w/cygwin 1.3.10

2002-05-21 Thread Kevin Layer
>> What does cygcheck -s say? Cygwin Win95/NT Configuration Diagnostics Current System Time: Tue May 21 20:37:06 2002 Windows 2000 Professional Ver 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2 Path: C:\ODI\OStore\bin . c:\bin C:\Perl\bin C:\Cygwin\bin c:\cygwin\usr\bi

Re: bogus PATH transformations in bash 2.05a.0(3)-release w/cygwin 1.3.10

2002-05-21 Thread Michael A Chase
On Tue, 21 May 2002 17:29:42 -0700 Kevin Layer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >D:\bug>PATH C:\Cygwin\bin;c:\cygwin\usr\bin;C:\Cygwin\usr\local\bin > >D:\bug>sh -i >$ make >echo /bin:/usr/bin:/usr/local/bin >/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/local/bin >/c/winnt/system32/cmd >Microsoft Wi

Re: bogus PATH transformations in bash 2.05a.0(3)-release w/cygwin 1.3.10

2002-05-21 Thread Kevin Layer
It's worse than I suspected originally, when I thought I could get around it by not using bash. Now, without bash: makefile: SHELL = sh default: FORCE echo $(PATH) /c/winnt/system32/cmd FORCE: and now: D:\bug>PATH C:\Cygwin\bin;c:\cygwin\usr\bin;C:\Cygwin\u